{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "2", "document_number": "643", "date": "03/11/22", "document_type": "Court Document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page 2 of 49\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\n\nBACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Jury Selection Process........................................................................................ 2\nII. Juror 50's Questionnaire and Voir Dire ....................................................................... 6\nIII. Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict .................................................... 8\n\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 10\nI. The Defendant's Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record....... 10\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 10\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 13\n1. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough .................... 13\n2. The Defendant Has Failed to Satisfy the Second Prong of McDonough ................. 19\nII. The Court Should Schedule a Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 .............................. 30\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 30\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 31\n1. The Court Should Conduct the Questioning ........................................................ 32\n2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited....................................................... 33\n3. There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness ....................................... 37\n4. The Defendant's \"Discovery\" Request Should Be Denied ...................................... 40\nIII. The Court Should Provide Juror 50 with a Copy of His Questionnaire\nBefore Any Hearing ......................................................................................................... 42\n\nCONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 47\n\n2\nDOJ-OGR-00009800", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page 2 of 49", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 1\n\nBACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 2\nI. The Jury Selection Process........................................................................................ 2\nII. Juror 50's Questionnaire and Voir Dire ....................................................................... 6\nIII. Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict .................................................... 8\n\nARGUMENT ......................................................................................................................... 10\nI. The Defendant's Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record....... 10\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 10\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 13\n1. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough .................... 13\n2. The Defendant Has Failed to Satisfy the Second Prong of McDonough ................. 19\nII. The Court Should Schedule a Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 .............................. 30\nA. Applicable Law ................................................................................................... 30\nB. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 31\n1. The Court Should Conduct the Questioning ........................................................ 32\n2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited....................................................... 33\n3. There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness ....................................... 37\n4. The Defendant's \"Discovery\" Request Should Be Denied ...................................... 40\nIII. The Court Should Provide Juror 50 with a Copy of His Questionnaire\nBefore Any Hearing ......................................................................................................... 42\n\nCONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................... 47", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "2", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00009800", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [], "organizations": [ "DOJ" ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "03/11/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "643", "DOJ-OGR-00009800" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document discusses a defendant's motion for a new trial and issues related to Juror 50. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions." }