{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "8", "document_number": "A-5823", "date": null, "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366\n1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime\n5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the\n6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that\n7 correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any\n12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was\n13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,\n15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared\n16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing\n17 information during the course of the trial. But I have\n18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.\n22 (Witness excused)\n23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the\n24 same law firm.\n25 BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010106", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "C2grdau4 Schoeman - cross 366", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. SHECHTMAN:\n4 Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime\n5 thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the\n6 conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that\n7 correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good.\n10 MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any\n12 understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was\n13 sharing this information or her deliberative process with you?\n14 THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We,\n15 having spent many months of trial together, often shared\n16 information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing\n17 information during the course of the trial. But I have\n18 described I think the entirety of the conversation.\n19 THE COURT: Anything further?\n20 MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down.\n22 (Witness excused)", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "23 MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the\n24 same law firm.", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "25 BARRY H. BERKE,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010106", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Mr. Shechtman", "Mr. Schoeman", "Ms. Trzaskoma", "Mr. Okula", "Mr. Parse", "Barry Berke", "Barry H. Berke" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "May 13th" ], "reference_numbers": [ "A-5823", "DOJ-OGR-00010106" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with some indication of a witness being excused and another attorney being called. The footer contains contact information for the court reporters and a reference number." }