{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "544",
    "date": "08/07/12",
    "document_type": "Affidavit",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, DONNA GUERIN, DENIS FIELD, and DAVID PARSE, Defendants. STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) ss.: DAVID PARSE, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. My name is David Parse, and I am a defendant in the above-captioned case. 2. During jury selection (or shortly thereafter), I heard one of the lawyers at the Brune firm (I believe it was Theresa Trzaskoma) say that there was a prospective juror (or a juror) who had the same name as a suspended attorney but that it was not the same person. I cannot recall if the lawyer was speaking to me or if I overheard her speaking to someone else. 3. A week after the verdict, I met with the Brune lawyers to discuss possible post-trial motions and appellate issues. The possibility of a juror misconduct issue was not raised. 4. It was not until after the Brune firm filed its motion for a new trial that I learned that prior to jury deliberations the issue of Conrad being a suspended lawyer had resurfaced. More precisely, to the best of my memory, it was after the July 15, 2011 conference call that I learned (i) that on May 12, 2011, Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that Juror No. 1",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, DONNA GUERIN, DENIS FIELD, and DAVID PARSE, Defendants.",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) ss.:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DAVID PARSE, being duly sworn, deposes and says:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1. My name is David Parse, and I am a defendant in the above-captioned case.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "2. During jury selection (or shortly thereafter), I heard one of the lawyers at the Brune firm (I believe it was Theresa Trzaskoma) say that there was a prospective juror (or a juror) who had the same name as a suspended attorney but that it was not the same person. I cannot recall if the lawyer was speaking to me or if I overheard her speaking to someone else.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3. A week after the verdict, I met with the Brune lawyers to discuss possible post-trial motions and appellate issues. The possibility of a juror misconduct issue was not raised.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4. It was not until after the Brune firm filed its motion for a new trial that I learned that prior to jury deliberations the issue of Conrad being a suspended lawyer had resurfaced.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "More precisely, to the best of my memory, it was after the July 15, 2011 conference call that I learned (i) that on May 12, 2011, Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that Juror No. 1",
      "position": "middle"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "David Parse",
      "Theresa Trzaskoma",
      "Conrad"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Brune firm",
      "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
      "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "July 15, 2011",
      "May 12, 2011",
      "08/07/12"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:09-cr-00581-WHP",
      "544",
      "S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing, specifically an affidavit from David Parse. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}