{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "34", "document_number": "645", "date": "03/11/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 34 of 50 34 M38TMAX1\n\n1 MS. MODE: Thank you, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: And then I will --\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I believe he mentioned something about his interview with the journalist Lucia, first name Lucia, and I was trying to follow his response, but he said something about: I didn't understand that this was an issue in the questionnaire. But I believe the reporting is that they discussed this at length, the consequences of him going public and the consequences of the fact that there was a jury questionnaire at issue here and there were answers to those questions that he would be talking about. I can't remember exactly what it is, but there was some discussion about the consequences of him going forward. And I believe what he said was: I didn't have any discussions or any lengthy discussions with the journalists about me coming forward and just answered their questions. But I believe there was a discussion with Lucia about the consequences, about whether he wants to do this, about -- I don't remember now --\n19 THE COURT: I don't understand what you're referring to.\n20 to.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: I think the issue is he was saying how he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this come out, even though he's talking to journalists. My understanding is he had a discussion with Lucia, the journalist\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00010249", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 34 of 50 34 M38TMAX1", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "1 MS. MODE: Thank you, your Honor.\n2 THE COURT: And then I will --\n3 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I believe he mentioned something about his interview with the journalist Lucia, first name Lucia, and I was trying to follow his response, but he said something about: I didn't understand that this was an issue in the questionnaire. But I believe the reporting is that they discussed this at length, the consequences of him going public and the consequences of the fact that there was a jury questionnaire at issue here and there were answers to those questions that he would be talking about. I can't remember exactly what it is, but there was some discussion about the consequences of him going forward. And I believe what he said was: I didn't have any discussions or any lengthy discussions with the journalists about me coming forward and just answered their questions. But I believe there was a discussion with Lucia about the consequences, about whether he wants to do this, about -- I don't remember now --\n19 THE COURT: I don't understand what you're referring to.\n20 to.\n21 MR. EVERDELL: I think the issue is he was saying how he didn't expect to be public, he didn't expect to be known worldwide as a victim of sexual abuse, he didn't expect this come out, even though he's talking to journalists. My understanding is he had a discussion with Lucia, the journalist", "position": "main" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00010249", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. MODE", "MR. EVERDELL", "Lucia" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "03/11/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "645", "DOJ-OGR-00010249" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }