{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "1", "document_number": "705", "date": "07/12/22", "document_type": "Court Document", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 705 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 12 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C Jeffrey Pagliuca HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com jpagliuca@hmflaw.com May 12, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to Government Letters dated May 4, and May 6, 2021 Regarding F.R. Crim. P. 17(c) Subpoena, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan, On March 15, 2021, Ms. Maxwell asked the Court to issue a F.R.Crim.P. 17(c)(3) subpoena for production of evidence controlled by Boies, Schiller, and Flexner (\"BSF\") lawyers working with the government on behalf of alleged (now-adult) witnesses. In her ex-parte application, Ms. Maxwell provided reasons for requesting certain items of evidence, including that the government either failed to secure the evidence or refused to produce it to Ms. Maxwell; she also disclosed theories related to her defense, strategy, and work product. After considering the application and BSF's response, the Court invited comment from the government regarding subpoenaed items 9 (a journal), 10 (boots), and 11(photographs). Specifically, the Court directed the government \"to notify the Court of its views as to Requests 9 through 11.\" Dkt. 252. The government's position is consistent with its general approach to evidence in this case which is to blindly accept information it considers unfavorable to Ms. Maxwell, begrudgingly DOJ-OGR-00011241", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 705 Filed 07/12/22 Page 1 of 12", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C Jeffrey Pagliuca HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com jpagliuca@hmflaw.com", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "May 12, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to Government Letters dated May 4, and May 6, 2021 Regarding F.R. Crim. P. 17(c) Subpoena, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan,", "position": "body" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "On March 15, 2021, Ms. Maxwell asked the Court to issue a F.R.Crim.P. 17(c)(3) subpoena for production of evidence controlled by Boies, Schiller, and Flexner (\"BSF\") lawyers working with the government on behalf of alleged (now-adult) witnesses. In her ex-parte application, Ms. Maxwell provided reasons for requesting certain items of evidence, including that the government either failed to secure the evidence or refused to produce it to Ms. Maxwell; she also disclosed theories related to her defense, strategy, and work product.", "position": "body" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "After considering the application and BSF's response, the Court invited comment from the government regarding subpoenaed items 9 (a journal), 10 (boots), and 11(photographs). Specifically, the Court directed the government \"to notify the Court of its views as to Requests 9 through 11.\" Dkt. 252.", "position": "body" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "The government's position is consistent with its general approach to evidence in this case which is to blindly accept information it considers unfavorable to Ms. Maxwell, begrudgingly", "position": "body" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011241", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "Jeffrey Pagliuca", "Alison J. Nathan", "Ghislaine Maxwell" ], "organizations": [ "Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C", "Boies, Schiller, and Flexner", "United States District Court", "Southern District of New York" ], "locations": [ "Denver, Colorado", "New York, NY" ], "dates": [ "May 12, 2021", "March 15, 2021", "May 4, 2021", "May 6, 2021", "07/12/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "Document 705", "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)", "Dkt. 252", "DOJ-OGR-00011241" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is well-formatted and printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps." }