{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "160",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": true,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 160 of 264 571 LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross evidence that could be put on extrinsically, specifically, her attorney's testimony. THE COURT: So you want to then call her attorney and ask her attorney if he told her, advised her that if she participated in this case, she would -- it would help her in the civil case. MS. MENNINGER: Right. Because that is the only portion that was waived. That's what he -- whatever he communicated to the government is what was waived. I don't think he's waived -- I'm not arguing for subject matter waiver, for example. THE COURT: So, first of all, as I've said before, you have to brief that. This is not enough. I haven't looked at any law on that question. You've put none before me. I made very clear you'd have to brief it. So we're not doing that today. MS. MENNINGER: No, I understand, your Honor. THE COURT: Ms. Moe, what's your response to the waiver question? MS. MOE: Your Honor, having not had an opportunity to research it or consider it or confer with Mr. Glassman, who -- it's not my privilege to hold, so I can't speak to its waiver without researching the issue and conferring with Mr. Glassman. THE COURT: The government not infrequently objects to privilege grounds to questions during trial. So the government SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012180",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 160 of 264 571",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "handwritten",
      "content": "LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "evidence that could be put on extrinsically, specifically, her attorney's testimony. THE COURT: So you want to then call her attorney and ask her attorney if he told her, advised her that if she participated in this case, she would -- it would help her in the civil case. MS. MENNINGER: Right. Because that is the only portion that was waived. That's what he -- whatever he communicated to the government is what was waived. I don't think he's waived -- I'm not arguing for subject matter waiver, for example. THE COURT: So, first of all, as I've said before, you have to brief that. This is not enough. I haven't looked at any law on that question. You've put none before me. I made very clear you'd have to brief it. So we're not doing that today. MS. MENNINGER: No, I understand, your Honor. THE COURT: Ms. Moe, what's your response to the waiver question? MS. MOE: Your Honor, having not had an opportunity to research it or consider it or confer with Mr. Glassman, who -- it's not my privilege to hold, so I can't speak to its waiver without researching the issue and conferring with Mr. Glassman. THE COURT: The government not infrequently objects to privilege grounds to questions during trial. So the government",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012180",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Menninger",
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Mr. Glassman"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012180"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with some handwritten notes in the margin. The text is mostly clear, but there may be some minor formatting issues due to the original document's layout."
}