{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "743",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 247 131\nor the 24th, and it's the weekend, Christmas weekend, 25th, 26th. The juror would be gone the 27th, 28th, would not make sense to return for one day of that week. So, really, it would be a 10-day break in the trial. I don't think that makes sense, Mr. Pagliuca. I know I mentioned that, but I'm not sure I had that fully in mind at the time, and that's practically what we would be talking about.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate that, your Honor. Again, I frankly don't want to delay this trial. The intention here is, first, I don't know which juror this is, and that would make a difference in my analysis here, frankly.\nTHE COURT: I mean, to be candid, that's why I'm not telling you, because -- I'm not telling either side because I think under the veil of ignorance is a better place for everybody to be.\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Let me be more specific, your Honor. I'm not asking to know the specific juror, but what would make a large difference to me is whether this person is in the alternate pool versus the main pool of jurors. I would have less of a problem excusing the juror if the juror was in the alternate pool as opposed to the main pool. And the reason I say that is we carefully exercised peremptory challenges in this case, both to the main pool and the alternate pool. Had we understood that if this juror's plans couldn't be changed, we would have made a different choice while the entire venire\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 247 131",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "or the 24th, and it's the weekend, Christmas weekend, 25th, 26th. The juror would be gone the 27th, 28th, would not make sense to return for one day of that week. So, really, it would be a 10-day break in the trial. I don't think that makes sense, Mr. Pagliuca. I know I mentioned that, but I'm not sure I had that fully in mind at the time, and that's practically what we would be talking about.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: I appreciate that, your Honor. Again, I frankly don't want to delay this trial. The intention here is, first, I don't know which juror this is, and that would make a difference in my analysis here, frankly.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: I mean, to be candid, that's why I'm not telling you, because -- I'm not telling either side because I think under the veil of ignorance is a better place for everybody to be.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: Let me be more specific, your Honor. I'm not asking to know the specific juror, but what would make a large difference to me is whether this person is in the alternate pool versus the main pool of jurors. I would have less of a problem excusing the juror if the juror was in the alternate pool as opposed to the main pool. And the reason I say that is we carefully exercised peremptory challenges in this case, both to the main pool and the alternate pool. Had we understood that if this juror's plans couldn't be changed, we would have made a different choice while the entire venire",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Pagliuca"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "25th",
      "26th",
      "27th",
      "28th"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "743"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}