{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "15",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 264 421 LC1VMAX1\n1 MS. MENNINGER: It's a type-up of the agent's notes.\n2 We also have the agent's handwritten notes.\n3 The next sentence -- then I'll explain what I think we\n4 may get to. The next sentence, she says, That home was a\n5 three-bedroom home in a gated community called Bear Lake,\n6 something like that. Those were the two statements that were\n7 typed up in the agent's 302.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MENNINGER: And in the handwritten notes.\n10 She's had a chance to explain it; in her mind, it's a\n11 typo. We have those agents on call to be witnesses, and they\n12 can talk about whether it was a typo or not a typo. I mean, I\n13 think that's the state of play in terms of contradicting a\n14 witness with a prior inconsistent statement.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Do we have issues to take up around\n19 specific identifying information?\n20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n21 Just to provide the Court with an update on the status\n22 of our conferral with defense counsel, defense counsel provided\n23 the government with a list of certain topics this morning,\n24 which we appreciated; and we had a productive conversation this\n25 morning about a number of those topics, and I think I've\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012035",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 264 421 LC1VMAX1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MENNINGER: It's a type-up of the agent's notes.\n2 We also have the agent's handwritten notes.\n3 The next sentence -- then I'll explain what I think we\n4 may get to. The next sentence, she says, That home was a\n5 three-bedroom home in a gated community called Bear Lake,\n6 something like that. Those were the two statements that were\n7 typed up in the agent's 302.\n8 THE COURT: Okay.\n9 MS. MENNINGER: And in the handwritten notes.\n10 She's had a chance to explain it; in her mind, it's a\n11 typo. We have those agents on call to be witnesses, and they\n12 can talk about whether it was a typo or not a typo. I mean, I\n13 think that's the state of play in terms of contradicting a\n14 witness with a prior inconsistent statement.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else on that?\n16 MR. ROHRBACH: Nothing from the government.\n17 MR. EVERDELL: No, your Honor. Thank you.\n18 THE COURT: Do we have issues to take up around\n19 specific identifying information?\n20 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n21 Just to provide the Court with an update on the status\n22 of our conferral with defense counsel, defense counsel provided\n23 the government with a list of certain topics this morning,\n24 which we appreciated; and we had a productive conversation this\n25 morning about a number of those topics, and I think I've",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012035",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "THE COURT",
      "MR. ROHRBACH",
      "MR. EVERDELL",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Bear Lake"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012035"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}