{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "81",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 81 of 264 487 LC1VMAX3 Jane - cross thus, it's offered about her particular bias -- THE COURT: Well, you heard the question. MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Do you object to the question? MS. MODE: We do object to the question. If the question is, Did you seek an increased amount in the settlement award, I have no objection to that. If the question is, Isn't it true your attorney made the following statement, that question is objectionable. THE COURT: Under 408. MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, it goes to bias, her motive to testify in this case, and her bias against my client. THE COURT: Let's start with a more basic issue which no one has briefed, but Manko v. United States, are you familiar? MS. MODE: I'm not, your Honor. THE COURT: 87 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 1996). I'll quote: \"the policy that underlies Rule 408 does not apply to criminal prosecutions. The policy favoring the encouragement of civil settlements sufficient to bar their admission in civil actions is insufficient, in our view, to outweigh the need for accurate determinations in criminal cases where the stakes are higher.\" Is that good law? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012101",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 81 of 264 487",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC1VMAX3 Jane - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "thus, it's offered about her particular bias -- THE COURT: Well, you heard the question. MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Do you object to the question? MS. MODE: We do object to the question. If the question is, Did you seek an increased amount in the settlement award, I have no objection to that. If the question is, Isn't it true your attorney made the following statement, that question is objectionable. THE COURT: Under 408. MS. MODE: Yes, your Honor. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, it goes to bias, her motive to testify in this case, and her bias against my client. THE COURT: Let's start with a more basic issue which no one has briefed, but Manko v. United States, are you familiar? MS. MODE: I'm not, your Honor. THE COURT: 87 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 1996). I'll quote: \"the policy that underlies Rule 408 does not apply to criminal prosecutions. The policy favoring the encouragement of civil settlements sufficient to bar their admission in civil actions is insufficient, in our view, to outweigh the need for accurate determinations in criminal cases where the stakes are higher.\" Is that good law?",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012101",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MODE",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "United States"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1996"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012101"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}