{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "212",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 212 of 264 623 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect that, but again, we're talking about a number of conversations during this time period. That's my current expectation. But I think with respect to I think some of the granular issues, the difference between woman and girls, I think, especially in this context is not so different that it would not be a prior consistent statement. And beyond that, your Honor, we think this tracks the rule. MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I disagree. The distinction between a girl and a woman is precisely what this case is about, and she was very clear that she felt like she was the only one. The other people were women. THE COURT: She said she didn't know what their ages were. MS. STERNHEIM: She didn't know their ages, but she did not refer to them as girls. THE COURT: But wasn't the recent testimony, I think it was on cross, which was: Were there underage girls. And she said, \"I wouldn't know the ages.\" MS. STERNHEIM: That's fine, but to call them girls connotes that they are minors, and that parlays right into the government's theory of the case, and they're bringing it out through a witness whose sole purpose is substantiated prior consistent statement, and that is not consistent with the testimony that we've heard. If he wants to say there were prior women, I can't SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012232",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 212 of 264 623 LC1Qmax6 Jane - Redirect",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "that, but again, we're talking about a number of conversations during this time period. That's my current expectation. But I think with respect to I think some of the granular issues, the difference between woman and girls, I think, especially in this context is not so different that it would not be a prior consistent statement. And beyond that, your Honor, we think this tracks the rule.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I disagree. The distinction between a girl and a woman is precisely what this case is about, and she was very clear that she felt like she was the only one. The other people were women.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: She said she didn't know what their ages were. MS. STERNHEIM: She didn't know their ages, but she did not refer to them as girls. THE COURT: But wasn't the recent testimony, I think it was on cross, which was: Were there underage girls. And she said, \"I wouldn't know the ages.\" MS. STERNHEIM: That's fine, but to call them girls connotes that they are minors, and that parlays right into the government's theory of the case, and they're bringing it out through a witness whose sole purpose is substantiated prior consistent statement, and that is not consistent with the testimony that we've heard. If he wants to say there were prior women, I can't",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012232",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. STERNHEIM"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012232"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}