{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "13", "document_number": "749", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 236 917 LBUCmax1\ngodfather and his goddaughter or is it deeply disturbing, overly sexualizing a young girl?\nWe would consent to another limiting instruction similar to the one that I proposed with respect to the master bedroom photograph, but this one if that addresses the concern about an improper inference the jury might draw.\nTHE COURT: So the time has elapsed between 288 and 250 in terms of the age of the girl?\nMS. COMEY: I would need to look, your Honor, to refresh my own recollection of how old she appears.\nTHE COURT: I thought you said that one when we first brought it up, but I'm not certain.\nMS. COMEY: I don't know that to be true, so I don't know if I did say that. I apologize. I don't know that to be true. I would want to check and look at the photograph myself.\nMR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we are displaying, if you want to see it, 288, which your Honor already excluded, side by side with the photo we're talking about now, 250, which we're seeking to exclude. We believe that's the same girl. To us --\nMS. COMEY: Can I see what you're showing?\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes.\nYour Honor, looking side by side, I believe we are talking about the exact same type of photo taken in the exact same scale with the exact same closeness of the exact same girl, is my belief. So I think it's the same ruling that your\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00012527", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 236 917 LBUCmax1", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "godfather and his goddaughter or is it deeply disturbing, overly sexualizing a young girl?\nWe would consent to another limiting instruction similar to the one that I proposed with respect to the master bedroom photograph, but this one if that addresses the concern about an improper inference the jury might draw.", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: So the time has elapsed between 288 and 250 in terms of the age of the girl?\nMS. COMEY: I would need to look, your Honor, to refresh my own recollection of how old she appears.\nTHE COURT: I thought you said that one when we first brought it up, but I'm not certain.\nMS. COMEY: I don't know that to be true, so I don't know if I did say that. I apologize. I don't know that to be true. I would want to check and look at the photograph myself.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we are displaying, if you want to see it, 288, which your Honor already excluded, side by side with the photo we're talking about now, 250, which we're seeking to exclude. We believe that's the same girl. To us --\nMS. COMEY: Can I see what you're showing?\nMR. EVERDELL: Yes.\nYour Honor, looking side by side, I believe we are talking about the exact same type of photo taken in the exact same scale with the exact same closeness of the exact same girl, is my belief. So I think it's the same ruling that your", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012527", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. COMEY", "MR. EVERDELL" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "749", "288", "250", "DOJ-OGR-00012527" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }