{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "257",
    "document_number": "751",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 261 1418 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct 1 And by the way, we were precluded from cross examination about her publicly available photographs of a similar type. 2 3 THE COURT: I don't understand the parallel. The relevance of this photo is that it was in possession of Epstein, which is different than the relevance that you were offering. I have to compare apples and apples. 4 5 6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, had she testified about the circumstances under which that was made, it may have made it very relevant. We're just not going to have testimony about the photograph having been made when it was made, how old she was, et cetera, and then once she's off the stand, introduce a photo of her that could have been authenticated through her, but was not. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MS. STERNHEIM: May I have a moment, Judge? 14 THE COURT: You may. 15 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, if I may, on the issue of this picture and the issue of nudity, I was essentially precluded from raising issues concerning nudity, and a witness who was brought up in the South of France, who was quoted as saying she is comfortable with being nude was an area ripe for cross examination if the government had not strategically decided not to use this photograph when the witness was on the stand. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Now, if they will permit the witness to be brought back, that's a whole different issue, but this idea that they can just put in evidence after a witness is off the stand and 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013008",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 261 1418 LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 And by the way, we were precluded from cross examination about her publicly available photographs of a similar type. 2 3 THE COURT: I don't understand the parallel. The relevance of this photo is that it was in possession of Epstein, which is different than the relevance that you were offering. I have to compare apples and apples. 4 5 6 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, had she testified about the circumstances under which that was made, it may have made it very relevant. We're just not going to have testimony about the photograph having been made when it was made, how old she was, et cetera, and then once she's off the stand, introduce a photo of her that could have been authenticated through her, but was not. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MS. STERNHEIM: May I have a moment, Judge? 14 THE COURT: You may. 15 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, if I may, on the issue of this picture and the issue of nudity, I was essentially precluded from raising issues concerning nudity, and a witness who was brought up in the South of France, who was quoted as saying she is comfortable with being nude was an area ripe for cross examination if the government had not strategically decided not to use this photograph when the witness was on the stand. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Now, if they will permit the witness to be brought back, that's a whole different issue, but this idea that they can just put in evidence after a witness is off the stand and 23 24 25",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013008",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "South of France"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "751",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013008"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}