{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "260",
    "document_number": "753",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 260 of 264 1701 LC7Cmax8\n1 if the Court wants to leave. It's very brief.\n2 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: So this is on the privilege objection, your Honor. The statement did not call for a communication.\n4 This was a request about materials shown to the witness in anticipation meeting with the government. Those are not\n5 privileged communications given that, whatever it is, is intended to be communicated to a third party, number 1, and\n6 number 2 --\n7 THE COURT: Well, I don't think you've made a record that any -- you asked generally about any materials shown to\n8 her. I don't think you've made a record that any materials shown to her were in anticipation of being -- how did you\n9 phrase it? Discussed with the government in the meeting?\n10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the Court sustained the objection and ordered me to move on, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: I understand. I'm just --\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: There was no opportunity to further that.\n13 THE COURT: Right. To be clear, I think the question was whether she was shown materials by her attorney, privilege\n14 objection sustained. There may have been other questions, I suppose that would have been different than that, but I\n15 sustained with respect to that question.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: So, I'm not arguing with your Honor.\n17 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\n18 DOJ-OGR-00013273",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 260 of 264 1701 LC7Cmax8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 if the Court wants to leave. It's very brief.\n2 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n3 MR. PAGLIUCA: So this is on the privilege objection, your Honor. The statement did not call for a communication.\n4 This was a request about materials shown to the witness in anticipation meeting with the government. Those are not\n5 privileged communications given that, whatever it is, is intended to be communicated to a third party, number 1, and\n6 number 2 --\n7 THE COURT: Well, I don't think you've made a record that any -- you asked generally about any materials shown to\n8 her. I don't think you've made a record that any materials shown to her were in anticipation of being -- how did you\n9 phrase it? Discussed with the government in the meeting?\n10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the Court sustained the objection and ordered me to move on, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: I understand. I'm just --\n12 MR. PAGLIUCA: There was no opportunity to further that.\n13 THE COURT: Right. To be clear, I think the question was whether she was shown materials by her attorney, privilege\n14 objection sustained. There may have been other questions, I suppose that would have been different than that, but I\n15 sustained with respect to that question.\n16 MR. PAGLIUCA: So, I'm not arguing with your Honor.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013273",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "753",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013273"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}