{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "16",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 262 1721 LC8Cmax1 that's a document created by managers at Mar-a-Lago and not the employee. THE COURT: I think, probably, 823 comes in, depending on the business record foundation, which essentially provides -- right. So this is a personnel form of Mar-a-Lago that your witness will testify they maintained in their records of employees? MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: So that, I think, you're right. Ms. Sternheim, do you have an objection to 823? MS. STERNHEIM: No. THE COURT: 824, I think that Ms. Sternheim is right, that the information filled out by the employee, which you're seeking to assert for the truth, essentially that Virginia Roberts was his daughter, as I understand it. MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: It would be hearsay unless there is testimony -- under the Lieberman case, unless there is testimony that the employer does something to verify the information. MR. ROHRBACH: I've never asked that question of Ms. Gill, your Honor. I'm happy to do so while we're waiting for the remaining juror. I would imagine she would say that Mar-a-Lago provides benefits to the daughter as a dependent of Mr. Roberts. So in the sense that they are, in fact, providing SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013294",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 262 1721 LC8Cmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "that's a document created by managers at Mar-a-Lago and not the employee. THE COURT: I think, probably, 823 comes in, depending on the business record foundation, which essentially provides -- right. So this is a personnel form of Mar-a-Lago that your witness will testify they maintained in their records of employees? MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: So that, I think, you're right. Ms. Sternheim, do you have an objection to 823? MS. STERNHEIM: No. THE COURT: 824, I think that Ms. Sternheim is right, that the information filled out by the employee, which you're seeking to assert for the truth, essentially that Virginia Roberts was his daughter, as I understand it. MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: It would be hearsay unless there is testimony -- under the Lieberman case, unless there is testimony that the employer does something to verify the information. MR. ROHRBACH: I've never asked that question of Ms. Gill, your Honor. I'm happy to do so while we're waiting for the remaining juror. I would imagine she would say that Mar-a-Lago provides benefits to the daughter as a dependent of Mr. Roberts. So in the sense that they are, in fact, providing",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013294",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Virginia Roberts",
      "Ms. Sternheim",
      "Mr. Rohrbach",
      "Ms. Gill",
      "Mr. Roberts"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Mar-a-Lago",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "823",
      "824",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013294"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}