{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "73",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/2022",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 73 of 262 1778 LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct 1 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, it is not. I think she can say this is the message pad. So it's not an authentication objection. It is, though, as to these individual slips, she has no knowledge about what's contained in them, and it goes to a business record foundation as in when it was made, when it was recorded, how it was stored, all of those sorts of things that a normal business record custodian would talk about. She, this particular witness, is not under any particular business duty to record these other messages and doesn't have any information about how these other messages may or may not have been recorded, by whom, when, where, how, all of those kinds of things. So, I don't think you can just say that we're going to take all these messages with all this different information in it and then say it's all business record, it all comes in for the truth of the matter asserted. That's my objection under 801, your Honor, and I suppose 803.6, which is the particular subsection under which it is being offered. MS. MOE: Taking those in turn, it appears defense counsel is not disputing the authenticity of these messages within the entire book because this witness has identified the book. It's a spiral bound book. It sounds like there is no dispute that these are authentic. So the only thing we're talking about here is a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013351",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 73 of 262 1778 LC8Cmax3 Hesse - direct",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, it is not. I think she can say this is the message pad. So it's not an authentication objection. It is, though, as to these individual slips, she has no knowledge about what's contained in them, and it goes to a business record foundation as in when it was made, when it was recorded, how it was stored, all of those sorts of things that a normal business record custodian would talk about. She, this particular witness, is not under any particular business duty to record these other messages and doesn't have any information about how these other messages may or may not have been recorded, by whom, when, where, how, all of those kinds of things. So, I don't think you can just say that we're going to take all these messages with all this different information in it and then say it's all business record, it all comes in for the truth of the matter asserted. That's my objection under 801, your Honor, and I suppose 803.6, which is the particular subsection under which it is being offered. MS. MOE: Taking those in turn, it appears defense counsel is not disputing the authenticity of these messages within the entire book because this witness has identified the book. It's a spiral bound book. It sounds like there is no dispute that these are authentic. So the only thing we're talking about here is a",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013351",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. PAGLIUCA",
      "MS. MOE"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "801",
      "803.6",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013351"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}