{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "168",
    "document_number": "755",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 262 1879\nLC8VMAX6 Rodgers - cross\n1 Q. Right?\n2 A. Sure.\n3 Q. Okay. Now, so I think there were several ways you could have seen some of the passengers on the flights?\n4\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. And over the years, I think you said you saw a lot of female passengers on Epstein's planes, right?\n7\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And you saw lots of women who were in their early twenties; correct?\n10\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. But you never saw a female passenger who you thought was under the age of 18, did you?\n13\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. In fact, you never saw any female on any of the planes who looked younger to you than 19 or 20; is that right?\n16\n17 A. Let me back up and say that there were -- there could have been some females under 18, but they were with their parents.\n18\n19 Q. Fair enough.\n20 Occasionally, you'd have younger females traveling with their parents, right?\n21\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Or maybe they were traveling with a nanny?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. But apart from those instances where a younger female is\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00013446",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 262 1879",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC8VMAX6 Rodgers - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Q. Right?\n2 A. Sure.\n3 Q. Okay. Now, so I think there were several ways you could have seen some of the passengers on the flights?\n4\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. And over the years, I think you said you saw a lot of female passengers on Epstein's planes, right?\n7\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And you saw lots of women who were in their early twenties; correct?\n10\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. But you never saw a female passenger who you thought was under the age of 18, did you?\n13\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. In fact, you never saw any female on any of the planes who looked younger to you than 19 or 20; is that right?\n16\n17 A. Let me back up and say that there were -- there could have been some females under 18, but they were with their parents.\n18\n19 Q. Fair enough.\n20 Occasionally, you'd have younger females traveling with their parents, right?\n21\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Or maybe they were traveling with a nanny?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. But apart from those instances where a younger female is",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013446",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "755",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013446"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}