{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "183",
    "document_number": "759",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 183 of 267 2211 LCAVMAX6 A. Farmer - cross 1 THE COURT: -- in 2006. 2 What's the next question? 3 MS. MENNINGER: It would just be, You did not want Epstein prosecuted in 2006? 4 5 THE COURT: You want to ask her if she wanted Epstein 6 prosecuted in 2006? 7 MS. MENNINGER: Yes. 8 THE COURT: What is the relevance of that? 9 MS. MENNINGER: Because she's changed her mind about 10 wanting people prosecuted in connection with this case. She 11 has a different bias today than she did in 2006; that she 12 brought up her lawsuit in connection with applying to the fund 13 and filing a civil lawsuit. When she didn't have those 14 motivations in 2006, she didn't want to prosecute. It's a 15 clear distinction in two different periods of time, 15 years 16 apart. It goes to our money theme, your Honor, that we opened 17 on. 18 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I just don't see the 19 relevance or basis for this line of questioning. 20 THE COURT: You're going to ask her if she wanted 21 Epstein prosecuted in 2006. And if she says yes, then what? 22 MS. MENNINGER: Agent Kuyrkendall is under subpoena, 23 your Honor, and testified that none of the victims she talked 24 to in '06 to '08 wanted them prosecuted. 25 THE COURT: You're not doing that. I've ruled on  SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00013774",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 183 of 267 2211 LCAVMAX6 A. Farmer - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: -- in 2006. 2 What's the next question? 3 MS. MENNINGER: It would just be, You did not want Epstein prosecuted in 2006? 4 5 THE COURT: You want to ask her if she wanted Epstein 6 prosecuted in 2006? 7 MS. MENNINGER: Yes. 8 THE COURT: What is the relevance of that? 9 MS. MENNINGER: Because she's changed her mind about 10 wanting people prosecuted in connection with this case. She 11 has a different bias today than she did in 2006; that she 12 brought up her lawsuit in connection with applying to the fund 13 and filing a civil lawsuit. When she didn't have those 14 motivations in 2006, she didn't want to prosecute. It's a 15 clear distinction in two different periods of time, 15 years 16 apart. It goes to our money theme, your Honor, that we opened 17 on. 18 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I just don't see the 19 relevance or basis for this line of questioning. 20 THE COURT: You're going to ask her if she wanted 21 Epstein prosecuted in 2006. And if she says yes, then what? 22 MS. MENNINGER: Agent Kuyrkendall is under subpoena, 23 your Honor, and testified that none of the victims she talked 24 to in '06 to '08 wanted them prosecuted. 25 THE COURT: You're not doing that. I've ruled on",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00013774",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER",
      "THE COURT",
      "MS. POMERANTZ",
      "Agent Kuyrkendall",
      "Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "2006",
      "08/10/22",
      "'06",
      "'08"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "759",
      "DOJ-OGR-00013774"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}