{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "27",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 27 of 197 2568\nLCFmax1\n1 Transcript at 2174 to 76 and 2194 to 95, I'll sustain.\n2 I sustained two objections to continuing question on this\n3 issue. Statement was read aloud and the defense made and can\n4 make its impeachment argument.\n5 2182 to 83, sustained. The statement was read aloud.\n6 2185 to 86, sustained. The Statement was read aloud\n7 and there is no inconsistency as I previously ruled at 2186.\n8 2195, sustained for the same reasons I just indicated.\n9 2197 and 98, sustained. Annie did not earlier\n10 characterize Ms. Maxwell as, quote, disinterested, but that's\n11 not an inconsistency. Further, Annie had no opportunity to\n12 explain or deny the statement or lack thereof.\n13 2209 to 13, sustained. There isn't an inconsistency\n14 and Annie answered, \"I don't recall.\"\n15 2224, sustained.\n16 I think that's it. And just on that last one, it was\n17 read aloud and I don't see an inference of inconsistency.\n18 Anything else on that?\n19 MS. COMEY: No, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: Ms. Menninger?\n21 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: Again, recognizing that the parties had\n23 agreed on others.\n24 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. Just with respect to\n25 one thing your Honor just said, because the statement was read\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014133",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 27 of 197 2568",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCFmax1",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 Transcript at 2174 to 76 and 2194 to 95, I'll sustain.\n2 I sustained two objections to continuing question on this\n3 issue. Statement was read aloud and the defense made and can\n4 make its impeachment argument.\n5 2182 to 83, sustained. The statement was read aloud.\n6 2185 to 86, sustained. The Statement was read aloud\n7 and there is no inconsistency as I previously ruled at 2186.\n8 2195, sustained for the same reasons I just indicated.\n9 2197 and 98, sustained. Annie did not earlier\n10 characterize Ms. Maxwell as, quote, disinterested, but that's\n11 not an inconsistency. Further, Annie had no opportunity to\n12 explain or deny the statement or lack thereof.\n13 2209 to 13, sustained. There isn't an inconsistency\n14 and Annie answered, \"I don't recall.\"\n15 2224, sustained.\n16 I think that's it. And just on that last one, it was\n17 read aloud and I don't see an inference of inconsistency.\n18 Anything else on that?\n19 MS. COMEY: No, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: Ms. Menninger?\n21 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: Again, recognizing that the parties had\n23 agreed on others.\n24 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. Just with respect to\n25 one thing your Honor just said, because the statement was read",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014133",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Annie",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "MS. COMEY",
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "2174",
      "2176",
      "2194",
      "2195",
      "2182",
      "2183",
      "2185",
      "2186",
      "2195",
      "2197",
      "2198",
      "2209",
      "2213",
      "2224",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014133"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding. The text is clear and legible, with no visible redactions or damage."
}