{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "128",
    "document_number": "763",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 197 2669\nLCHVMAX4\nDubin - cross\n1 they had an open relationship?\n2 THE WITNESS: I can't really say that I knew whether\n3 they did or did not.\n4 BY MS. MOE:\n5 Q. Based on your interactions with them in the 1990s, it was\n6 your understanding at the time that Maxwell was responsible for\n7 navigating all of the details of Mr. Epstein's personal life;\n8 is that correct?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the lack of foundation, your\n10 Honor. And it's also a compound question.\n11 THE COURT: Sustained.\n12 Q. In the 1990s, what was your understanding of what Maxwell's\n13 role was in Epstein's life?\n14 MR. PAGLIUCA: Again, I object to the lack of\n15 foundation and the time frame, your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: Sustained.\n17 Q. Focusing on the time period from 1994 and 2000, did you\n18 have an understanding of what Maxwell's role was in Epstein's\n19 life?\n20 A. I think I do.\n21 Q. What kinds of things did you see Maxwell doing for Jeffrey\n22 Epstein between 1994 and 2000?\n23 A. I can't say that I saw what she did, but my understanding\n24 was that --\n25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm going to object to the rest of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00014234",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 197 2669",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LCHVMAX4\nDubin - cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 they had an open relationship?\n2 THE WITNESS: I can't really say that I knew whether\n3 they did or did not.\n4 BY MS. MOE:\n5 Q. Based on your interactions with them in the 1990s, it was\n6 your understanding at the time that Maxwell was responsible for\n7 navigating all of the details of Mr. Epstein's personal life;\n8 is that correct?\n9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Object to the lack of foundation, your\n10 Honor. And it's also a compound question.\n11 THE COURT: Sustained.\n12 Q. In the 1990s, what was your understanding of what Maxwell's\n13 role was in Epstein's life?\n14 MR. PAGLIUCA: Again, I object to the lack of\n15 foundation and the time frame, your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: Sustained.\n17 Q. Focusing on the time period from 1994 and 2000, did you\n18 have an understanding of what Maxwell's role was in Epstein's\n19 life?\n20 A. I think I do.\n21 Q. What kinds of things did you see Maxwell doing for Jeffrey\n22 Epstein between 1994 and 2000?\n23 A. I can't say that I saw what she did, but my understanding\n24 was that --\n25 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm going to object to the rest of",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014234",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell",
      "Epstein",
      "Jeffrey Epstein",
      "MS. MOE",
      "MR. PAGLIUCA"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22",
      "1990s",
      "1994",
      "2000"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "763",
      "DOJ-OGR-00014234"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear structure and formatting. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The content is a Q&A session between MS. MOE and a witness, with objections raised by MR. PAGLIUCA."
}