{ "document_metadata": { "page_number": "3", "document_number": "769", "date": "08/10/22", "document_type": "court transcript", "has_handwriting": false, "has_stamps": false }, "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 19 3094 LCLVMAXT\n\nProposals for how to respond.\n\nMS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe a note saying that that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate response.\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think since there was impeachment from the document -- I agree it's not a deposition, and I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is 613 impeachment from that document. I think the Court -- and Ms. Sternheim tells me what I was about to say, which is good; we're consistent.\n\nI think something like, you know, You have the evidence and testimony relating to 3505-005. That's it. I don't think that there should be any further discussion about what is or is not in evidence.\n\nTHE COURT: How about \"all admitted exhibits are before you.\"\n\nMS. COMEY: I think that's fine, your Honor.\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: The problem, your Honor, is that there's testimony about it.\n\nTHE COURT: You lost your mic.\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: Sorry.\n\nThere's testimony about it.\n\nTHE COURT: It's true they've not asked for that though.\n\nMR. PAGLIUCA: They do have the transcript where it's\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00014661", "text_blocks": [ { "type": "printed", "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 19 3094 LCLVMAXT", "position": "header" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "Proposals for how to respond.", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe a note saying that that document is not in evidence would be an appropriate response.", "position": "top" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think since there was impeachment from the document -- I agree it's not a deposition, and I agree that the document is not in evidence. But there is 613 impeachment from that document. I think the Court -- and Ms. Sternheim tells me what I was about to say, which is good; we're consistent.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "I think something like, you know, You have the evidence and testimony relating to 3505-005. That's it. I don't think that there should be any further discussion about what is or is not in evidence.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: How about \"all admitted exhibits are before you.\"", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MS. COMEY: I think that's fine, your Honor.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem, your Honor, is that there's testimony about it.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: You lost your mic.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: Sorry.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "There's testimony about it.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "THE COURT: It's true they've not asked for that though.", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "MR. PAGLIUCA: They do have the transcript where it's", "position": "middle" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300", "position": "footer" }, { "type": "printed", "content": "DOJ-OGR-00014661", "position": "footer" } ], "entities": { "people": [ "MS. COMEY", "MR. PAGLIUCA", "MS. STERNHEIM" ], "organizations": [ "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C." ], "locations": [], "dates": [ "08/10/22" ], "reference_numbers": [ "1:20-cr-00330-PAE", "769", "3505-005", "613", "DOJ-OGR-00014661" ] }, "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage." }