{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "3",
    "document_number": "773",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 29 3120 LCRVMAXT\n1 THE COURT: Just a moment.\n2 Trying to get my things up and running here.\n3 Yes.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n5 So I think there are -- if I recall, there are cases\n6 that do try to define those words in a little bit more detail.\n7 I don't have those cases at my fingertips and I'm trying to get\n8 them online, but I don't think we have WiFi in the courtroom.\n9 THE COURT: I have one. United States v. Almonte, 16\n10 CR 670; and United States v. Dupigny, 19 CR 528, gave a little\n11 bit of elaboration on that series of words.\n12 For \"entice\" -- I think this is true for both those\n13 cases, I'll confirm -- they provided in the charge that\n14 \"entice\" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or\n15 desire. I think I recall, Mr. Rohrbach, you referenced that\n16 definition at one point when we were discussing an issue, if\n17 I'm not mistaken.\n18 Is that what you had in mind, Mr. Everdell?\n19 MR. EVERDELL: The one I was thinking of, I think, is\n20 the one -- I'm trying to find the name, is it -- should be in\n21 my notes. Just give me one minute, your Honor. The one where\n22 we were arguing the Rule 29, which I cited to the Court,\n23 Broxmeyer, I think; am I correct about that?\n24 THE COURT: I don't know. This was the causation --\n25 you wanted me to define with respect to causation, is that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 29 3120 LCRVMAXT",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 THE COURT: Just a moment.\n2 Trying to get my things up and running here.\n3 Yes.\n4 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.\n5 So I think there are -- if I recall, there are cases\n6 that do try to define those words in a little bit more detail.\n7 I don't have those cases at my fingertips and I'm trying to get\n8 them online, but I don't think we have WiFi in the courtroom.\n9 THE COURT: I have one. United States v. Almonte, 16\n10 CR 670; and United States v. Dupigny, 19 CR 528, gave a little\n11 bit of elaboration on that series of words.\n12 For \"entice\" -- I think this is true for both those\n13 cases, I'll confirm -- they provided in the charge that\n14 \"entice\" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or\n15 desire. I think I recall, Mr. Rohrbach, you referenced that\n16 definition at one point when we were discussing an issue, if\n17 I'm not mistaken.\n18 Is that what you had in mind, Mr. Everdell?\n19 MR. EVERDELL: The one I was thinking of, I think, is\n20 the one -- I'm trying to find the name, is it -- should be in\n21 my notes. Just give me one minute, your Honor. The one where\n22 we were arguing the Rule 29, which I cited to the Court,\n23 Broxmeyer, I think; am I correct about that?\n24 THE COURT: I don't know. This was the causation --\n25 you wanted me to define with respect to causation, is that",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Everdell",
      "Mr. Rohrbach"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "773",
      "16 CR 670",
      "19 CR 528"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}