DOJ-OGR-00000436.json 4.2 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "6",
  4. "document_number": "22",
  5. "date": "July 16, 2019",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 22 Filed 07/16/19 Page 6 of 9\n\nHon. Richard M. Berman\nJuly 16, 2019\nPage 6\n\nappropriate New Mexico official, Detective Deborah Anaya, when he spent any time at his ranch there. (The underlying documents are available upon request.)\n\nSixth, though some studies may well indicate that sex offender recidivism rates \"actually go[] up at 15 years,\" as Your Honor suggested from the bench,5 others reach the opposite conclusion. For example, a respected study found that the relapse risk drops substantially the longer a person remains sex-offense free in the community.6 Another determined that it's mistaken to think of anyone who's been offense-free for 15 years as high-risk.7\n\nSeventh, to the extent third-party counsel (Mr. Boies) speculated that the alleged November 28 and December 3, 2018 payments8 were\n\n5 7/15/19 Tr. 34.\n\n6 Hanson et al., \"High-Risk Sex Offenders May Not Be High Risk Forever,\" Journal of Interpersonal Violence (March 2014), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261069441_High-Risk_Sex_Offenders_May_Not_Be_High_Risk_Forever.\n\n7 Ira Mark & Tara Ellman, \"Frightening and High': The Supreme Court's Crucial Mistake About Sex Crime Statistics\" (2015). Constitutional Commentary. 419. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/419.\n\n8 7/12/19 Ltr. 11.\n\nDOJ-OGR-00000436",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 22 Filed 07/16/19 Page 6 of 9",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Hon. Richard M. Berman\nJuly 16, 2019\nPage 6",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "appropriate New Mexico official, Detective Deborah Anaya, when he spent any time at his ranch there. (The underlying documents are available upon request.)",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Sixth, though some studies may well indicate that sex offender recidivism rates \"actually go[] up at 15 years,\" as Your Honor suggested from the bench,5 others reach the opposite conclusion. For example, a respected study found that the relapse risk drops substantially the longer a person remains sex-offense free in the community.6 Another determined that it's mistaken to think of anyone who's been offense-free for 15 years as high-risk.7",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "Seventh, to the extent third-party counsel (Mr. Boies) speculated that the alleged November 28 and December 3, 2018 payments8 were",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "5 7/15/19 Tr. 34.\n6 Hanson et al., \"High-Risk Sex Offenders May Not Be High Risk Forever,\" Journal of Interpersonal Violence (March 2014), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261069441_High-Risk_Sex_Offenders_May_Not_Be_High_Risk_Forever.\n7 Ira Mark & Tara Ellman, \"Frightening and High': The Supreme Court's Crucial Mistake About Sex Crime Statistics\" (2015). Constitutional Commentary. 419. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/419.\n8 7/12/19 Ltr. 11.",
  40. "position": "bottom"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000436",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Richard M. Berman",
  51. "Deborah Anaya",
  52. "Mr. Boies",
  53. "Hanson",
  54. "Ira Mark",
  55. "Tara Ellman"
  56. ],
  57. "organizations": [
  58. "Supreme Court"
  59. ],
  60. "locations": [
  61. "New Mexico"
  62. ],
  63. "dates": [
  64. "July 16, 2019",
  65. "November 28, 2018",
  66. "December 3, 2018",
  67. "March 2014",
  68. "2015",
  69. "7/15/19",
  70. "7/12/19"
  71. ],
  72. "reference_numbers": [
  73. "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
  74. "Document 22",
  75. "DOJ-OGR-00000436"
  76. ]
  77. },
  78. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with references to legal cases and studies. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document is well-formatted and legible."
  79. }