mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000494.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "23",
    "document_number": "32",
    "date": "07/18/19",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 23 of 33\nhis [unlawful] conduct, by . . . contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters.\"\nIndictment ¶ 4. These crimes, as already noted, carry a maximum sentence of 45 years of\nincarceration and give rise to a presumption of pre-trial remand. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e)(3)(E); see United States v. Hardy, 2019 WL 2211210, at *10 (D.D.C. May 22, 2019) (\"The significant\nharms and dangers of these crimes animated the Congress to create the statutory presumption of\ndetention.\") The nature and circumstances of the crimes charged and the severity of the potential\npunishment support a finding that Defendant poses \"a serious flight risk and that no conditions\ncan be set to reasonably assure his appearance for trial.\" United States v. Cilins, 2013 WL\n3802012, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2013).\n\n- Weight Of The Evidence\n\nThe Government's evidence against Mr. Epstein appears strong. The evidence includes\ntestimony of victims, some of whom were minor girls when they were allegedly sexually abused\nby Mr. Epstein; other witnesses, including potential coconspirators; physical evidence, including\npassports reflecting extensive foreign travel; sexually suggestive photographs of nude underage\ngirls; plea discussions; and police reports describing witness tampering and intimidation. See,\ne.g., United States v. Fama, 2013 WL 2467985, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 7, 2013) (\"the Court\nrecognizes the difficulty inherent in assessing the Government's case before trial, and is mindful\nnot to reach any conclusions about [the Defendant's] guilt or innocence. Indeed, some courts\nhave described the weight of the evidence factor as the 'least important' of the § 3142(g) factors\nfor these reasons.\"); see also Hir, 517 F.3d at 1090.\n\n- History And Characteristics Of The Defendant Including His Financial Resources\n\nMr. Epstein pled guilty to two state felonies involving minor girls in Florida. He also\nheld plea discussions regarding witness tampering in Florida in 2008. He is a registered Level III",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 23 of 33",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "his [unlawful] conduct, by . . . contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters.\"\nIndictment ¶ 4. These crimes, as already noted, carry a maximum sentence of 45 years of\nincarceration and give rise to a presumption of pre-trial remand. 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e)(3)(E); see United States v. Hardy, 2019 WL 2211210, at *10 (D.D.C. May 22, 2019) (\"The significant\nharms and dangers of these crimes animated the Congress to create the statutory presumption of\ndetention.\") The nature and circumstances of the crimes charged and the severity of the potential\npunishment support a finding that Defendant poses \"a serious flight risk and that no conditions\ncan be set to reasonably assure his appearance for trial.\" United States v. Cilins, 2013 WL\n3802012, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2013).\n\n- Weight Of The Evidence\n\nThe Government's evidence against Mr. Epstein appears strong. The evidence includes\ntestimony of victims, some of whom were minor girls when they were allegedly sexually abused\nby Mr. Epstein; other witnesses, including potential coconspirators; physical evidence, including\npassports reflecting extensive foreign travel; sexually suggestive photographs of nude underage\ngirls; plea discussions; and police reports describing witness tampering and intimidation. See,\ne.g., United States v. Fama, 2013 WL 2467985, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 7, 2013) (\"the Court\nrecognizes the difficulty inherent in assessing the Government's case before trial, and is mindful\nnot to reach any conclusions about [the Defendant's] guilt or innocence. Indeed, some courts\nhave described the weight of the evidence factor as the 'least important' of the § 3142(g) factors\nfor these reasons.\"); see also Hir, 517 F.3d at 1090.\n\n- History And Characteristics Of The Defendant Including His Financial Resources\n\nMr. Epstein pled guilty to two state felonies involving minor girls in Florida. He also\nheld plea discussions regarding witness tampering in Florida in 2008. He is a registered Level III",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "23",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000494",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Mr. Epstein",
      "Hardy",
      "Cilins",
      "Fama",
      "Hir"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Government"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Florida",
      "D.D.C.",
      "S.D.N.Y."
    ],
    "dates": [
      "May 22, 2019",
      "July 19, 2013",
      "June 7, 2013",
      "2008",
      "07/18/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 32",
      "18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e)(3)(E)",
      "§ 3142(g)"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case against Mr. Epstein. The text is printed and legible. There are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
}