mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000518.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "8",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 8 of 74 8\nlegal or administrative proceedings in Florida, the Virgin\nIslands, New Mexico, and any other jurisdiction comparable to\nthe one before Judge Pickholz in which she ruled on 1-18-2011.\nSo I'm not suggesting that there are, although I think\nI did read someplace that there may be some proceeding pending\nin New Mexico. I'm not quite sure. That's what I hoped you\ncould help me out on.\nIt doesn't have to be precisely the same proceeding\nthat Judge Pickholz had. I'm looking for any transcripts in\nparticular and administrative or legal proceedings in other\nstates relating in any way to Mr. Epstein's sex offender\nstatus.\nThe third question on my mind is this: The defense\nhas submitted a brief financial summary to the Court of\nMr. Epstein's assets. And I, as you know, permitted that it be\nsubmitted under seal for, among other reasons that were on my\nmind, not to slow the proceedings down.\nThe summary is cursory I would say, short, less than a\npage and does not fully assist me in rendering the bail/remand\ndecision, that is to say, in its detail or absence of detail.\nAnd moreover, the information provided in that summary seems to\nbe known already to the government in other ways. They seem to\nhave gotten that information from other sources.\nSo I am inclined to place the summary on the docket,\nbut I want to hear from both sides whether I should or should\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000518",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 8 of 74 8",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "legal or administrative proceedings in Florida, the Virgin\nIslands, New Mexico, and any other jurisdiction comparable to\nthe one before Judge Pickholz in which she ruled on 1-18-2011.\nSo I'm not suggesting that there are, although I think\nI did read someplace that there may be some proceeding pending\nin New Mexico. I'm not quite sure. That's what I hoped you\ncould help me out on.\nIt doesn't have to be precisely the same proceeding\nthat Judge Pickholz had. I'm looking for any transcripts in\nparticular and administrative or legal proceedings in other\nstates relating in any way to Mr. Epstein's sex offender\nstatus.\nThe third question on my mind is this: The defense\nhas submitted a brief financial summary to the Court of\nMr. Epstein's assets. And I, as you know, permitted that it be\nsubmitted under seal for, among other reasons that were on my\nmind, not to slow the proceedings down.\nThe summary is cursory I would say, short, less than a\npage and does not fully assist me in rendering the bail/remand\ndecision, that is to say, in its detail or absence of detail.\nAnd moreover, the information provided in that summary seems to\nbe known already to the government in other ways. They seem to\nhave gotten that information from other sources.\nSo I am inclined to place the summary on the docket,\nbut I want to hear from both sides whether I should or should",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000518",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Judge Pickholz",
      "Mr. Epstein"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Florida",
      "Virgin Islands",
      "New Mexico"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "1-18-2011",
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000518"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}