mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000531.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "21",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 21 of 74 21\ngovernment is not aware of any at this time, your Honor.\n\nNow, turning just very briefly to some of the legal\narguments that defense counsel raised in their submission, the\ndefendant raised legal arguments that he says he intends to\nargue later.\n\nThe Court should have no confidence whatsoever that\nthe defendant would stick around to pursue long-shot, dubious\nlegal arguments at some future time. As set forth in the\ngovernment's submission, the non-prosecution agreement does not\npreclude this prosecution.\n\nAnd even if that agreement were applicable to this\ndistrict, which it is not, the defense itself acknowledges that\nthe indictment included evidence beyond the initial\ninvestigation. That effectively moots this issue for the bail\nargument. This case will go forward.\n\nThe defendant will lose any argument about due\nprocess. He will lose any argument about pre-indictment delay.\nAnd if he choses to be tried before a jury of his peers, we are\nconfident he will be convicted.\n\nThe Court should ensure he is here when that time\ncomes by ordering his detention.\n\nTHE COURT: Counsel.\n\nMR. WEINBERG: Thank you, your Honor.\n\nIf I can, your Honor, before responding to the Court's\nquestions, put this case in some context.\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000531",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 21 of 74 21",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "government is not aware of any at this time, your Honor.\n\nNow, turning just very briefly to some of the legal\narguments that defense counsel raised in their submission, the\ndefendant raised legal arguments that he says he intends to\nargue later.\n\nThe Court should have no confidence whatsoever that\nthe defendant would stick around to pursue long-shot, dubious\nlegal arguments at some future time. As set forth in the\ngovernment's submission, the non-prosecution agreement does not\npreclude this prosecution.\n\nAnd even if that agreement were applicable to this\ndistrict, which it is not, the defense itself acknowledges that\nthe indictment included evidence beyond the initial\ninvestigation. That effectively moots this issue for the bail\nargument. This case will go forward.\n\nThe defendant will lose any argument about due\nprocess. He will lose any argument about pre-indictment delay.\nAnd if he choses to be tried before a jury of his peers, we are\nconfident he will be convicted.\n\nThe Court should ensure he is here when that time\ncomes by ordering his detention.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "THE COURT: Counsel.\n\nMR. WEINBERG: Thank you, your Honor.\n\nIf I can, your Honor, before responding to the Court's\nquestions, put this case in some context.",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000531",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. WEINBERG"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 36",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000531"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}