| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "26",
- "document_number": "36",
- "date": "07/24/19",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 26 of 74 26\nhead of the first assistant, Mr. Sloman.\nTHE COURT: In New York.\nMR. WEINBERG: Right. In the Southern district, there were six or seven prosecutors, including New York City prosecutors, in what was either the largest or second largest U.S. Attorney's Office. I don't know how the manpower compares to the Southern District of New York.\nThis was well thought through. Again, it was with consultation of the Department of Justice before September 24 and then again after where the government continued to investigate.\nTHE COURT: Is Mr. Filip the highest level official in the Department of Justice?\nMR. WEINBERG: Yes. He was just one step below the Attorney General.\nTHE COURT: He was Deputy Attorney General?\nMR. WEINBERG: Deputy Attorney General.\nIn May or June of 2008, he approved the discretion to enter the NPA and to essentially endorse the decision and implicitly endorsed that there was some federal interest in this case because we were contesting whether or not this was a case that warranted the weight of the federal government which required Mr. Epstein to go to the state which had returned an indictment for solicitation and actually urged the state of Florida to bring a second charge that would subject Mr. Epstein\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00000536",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 26 of 74 26",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "head of the first assistant, Mr. Sloman.\nTHE COURT: In New York.\nMR. WEINBERG: Right. In the Southern district, there were six or seven prosecutors, including New York City prosecutors, in what was either the largest or second largest U.S. Attorney's Office. I don't know how the manpower compares to the Southern District of New York.\nThis was well thought through. Again, it was with consultation of the Department of Justice before September 24 and then again after where the government continued to investigate.\nTHE COURT: Is Mr. Filip the highest level official in the Department of Justice?\nMR. WEINBERG: Yes. He was just one step below the Attorney General.\nTHE COURT: He was Deputy Attorney General?\nMR. WEINBERG: Deputy Attorney General.\nIn May or June of 2008, he approved the discretion to enter the NPA and to essentially endorse the decision and implicitly endorsed that there was some federal interest in this case because we were contesting whether or not this was a case that warranted the weight of the federal government which required Mr. Epstein to go to the state which had returned an indictment for solicitation and actually urged the state of Florida to bring a second charge that would subject Mr. Epstein",
- "position": "main"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000536",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Mr. Sloman",
- "Mr. Weinberg",
- "Mr. Filip",
- "Mr. Epstein",
- "Attorney General"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "Department of Justice",
- "U.S. Attorney's Office",
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "New York",
- "Southern District of New York",
- "Florida"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "07/24/19",
- "September 24",
- "May or June of 2008"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
- "Document 36",
- "DOJ-OGR-00000536"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear printed text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|