mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000562.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "52",
    "document_number": "36",
    "date": "07/24/19",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 52 of 74 52\n1 not appropriate, despite all of the conditions that we argue\n2 provide a compelling basis for both safety and appearance, that\n3 I don't think the financial conditions information should be\n4 other than confidential because it wasn't at the heart of the\n5 judicial ruling that the public would want to understand.\n6 THE COURT: I'm not sure I understand why it comes in\n7 sort of heads, I win/tails you lose. Or no?\n8 If it's a public interest and no harm in releasing it\n9 and if you were to get bail you would happily release it. But\n10 if you didn't, you wouldn't, I don't really get why it wouldn't\n11 just be disclosable in either case.\n12 MR. WEINBERG: It's two reasons really. One is that\n13 the financial information, if provided to pretrial, is\n14 confidential and to be used by the Court for bail\n15 determinations. Two is there is an enormous public interest --\n16 THE COURT: That's true even if I determined that\n17 there should be bail.\n18 MR. WEINBERG: Yes, your Honor. But I do think, as\n19 much as I'm not urging the Court to disclose it, I think there\n20 are overriding considerations that if your Honor were to\n21 release a man on bail, the public has a right to know the your\n22 bail conditions -- how they correlate to a man's wealth.\n23 If a man has a billion dollars -- and he doesn't. If\n24 your Honor were to set a $20 million bail, that's an enormous\n25 bail for someone with $21 million but not an enormous bail for\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 36 Filed 07/24/19 Page 52 of 74 52",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 not appropriate, despite all of the conditions that we argue\n2 provide a compelling basis for both safety and appearance, that\n3 I don't think the financial conditions information should be\n4 other than confidential because it wasn't at the heart of the\n5 judicial ruling that the public would want to understand.\n6 THE COURT: I'm not sure I understand why it comes in\n7 sort of heads, I win/tails you lose. Or no?\n8 If it's a public interest and no harm in releasing it\n9 and if you were to get bail you would happily release it. But\n10 if you didn't, you wouldn't, I don't really get why it wouldn't\n11 just be disclosable in either case.\n12 MR. WEINBERG: It's two reasons really. One is that\n13 the financial information, if provided to pretrial, is\n14 confidential and to be used by the Court for bail\n15 determinations. Two is there is an enormous public interest --\n16 THE COURT: That's true even if I determined that\n17 there should be bail.\n18 MR. WEINBERG: Yes, your Honor. But I do think, as\n19 much as I'm not urging the Court to disclose it, I think there\n20 are overriding considerations that if your Honor were to\n21 release a man on bail, the public has a right to know the your\n22 bail conditions -- how they correlate to a man's wealth.\n23 If a man has a billion dollars -- and he doesn't. If\n24 your Honor were to set a $20 million bail, that's an enormous\n25 bail for someone with $21 million but not an enormous bail for",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MR. WEINBERG"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/24/19"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "36",
      "52",
      "74",
      "$20 million",
      "$21 million",
      "(212) 805-0300"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}