| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "27",
- "document_number": "53",
- "date": "09/03/19",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 53 Filed 09/03/19 Page 27 of 86 27 J8RsEPS1 he was deeply troubled by the alleged Brady violations. I represented the prosecutors in that case, so I'm very, very familiar with it. It is analogous. It is a situation where there was tremendous controversy over what happened in the case and whether or not the prosecutors went off the reservation. Judge Sullivan -- and there were three or four independent -- not independent, DOJ inquiries into the very same matter. But Judge Sullivan wanted his own opportunity to make a judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federal prisoners were being held -- we don't have a federal MCC in Boston -- went to the prison, stayed in the prison to determine whether or not the complaints about the conditions were authentic. I think your Honor has the inherent authority to go to the ninth floor and see how the MCC houses pretrial detainees. Thank you. THE COURT: Are you saying that whether or not the motion is granted that is pending before us? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00000665",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 53 Filed 09/03/19 Page 27 of 86 27",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "J8RsEPS1 he was deeply troubled by the alleged Brady violations. I represented the prosecutors in that case, so I'm very, very familiar with it. It is analogous. It is a situation where there was tremendous controversy over what happened in the case and whether or not the prosecutors went off the reservation. Judge Sullivan -- and there were three or four independent -- not independent, DOJ inquiries into the very same matter. But Judge Sullivan wanted his own opportunity to make a judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federal prisoners were being held -- we don't have a federal MCC in Boston -- went to the prison, stayed in the prison to determine whether or not the complaints about the conditions were authentic. I think your Honor has the inherent authority to go to the ninth floor and see how the MCC houses pretrial detainees. Thank you. THE COURT: Are you saying that whether or not the motion is granted that is pending before us?",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000665",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Judge Sullivan",
- "Judge Wolf",
- "MR. WEINBERG"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "DOJ",
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.",
- "MCC"
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Massachusetts",
- "Boston",
- "Walpole"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "09/03/19"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
- "Document 53",
- "DOJ-OGR-00000665"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|