mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00000735.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "61",
    "date": "07/18/25",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 61 Filed 07/18/25 Page 4 of 4\nshould end.\" Id. Notably, the privacy interests at stake on the other side of the balance are substantially diminished due to Epstein's death. Of course, as noted above, the Department of Justice will work with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to redact all victim-identifying information prior to any release.\n6. For these reasons, this Court should conclude that the Epstein and Maxwell cases qualify as a matter of public interest, release the associated grand jury transcripts, and lift any preexisting protective orders. See In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 105 (\"It is ... entirely conceivable that in some situations historical or public interest alone could justify the release of grand jury information.\")\nRespectfully submitted,\nPAMELA J. BONDI\nU.S. Attorney General\n/s/ Todd Blanche\nTODD BLANCHE\nDeputy Attorney General\n4\nDOJ-OGR-00000735",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 61 Filed 07/18/25 Page 4 of 4",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "should end.\" Id. Notably, the privacy interests at stake on the other side of the balance are substantially diminished due to Epstein's death. Of course, as noted above, the Department of Justice will work with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to redact all victim-identifying information prior to any release.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "6. For these reasons, this Court should conclude that the Epstein and Maxwell cases qualify as a matter of public interest, release the associated grand jury transcripts, and lift any preexisting protective orders. See In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 105 (\"It is ... entirely conceivable that in some situations historical or public interest alone could justify the release of grand jury information.\")",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Respectfully submitted,",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PAMELA J. BONDI\nU.S. Attorney General",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "signature",
      "content": "/s/ Todd Blanche",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TODD BLANCHE\nDeputy Attorney General",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "4",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00000735",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Maxwell",
      "Pamela J. Bondi",
      "Todd Blanche"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Department of Justice",
      "United States Attorney's Office",
      "Southern District of New York"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "07/18/25"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:19-cr-00490-RMB",
      "Document 61",
      "DOJ-OGR-00000735"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the Epstein and Maxwell cases. It is a formal legal document with proper formatting and signatures. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}