DOJ-OGR-00001452.json 4.0 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "12",
  4. "document_number": "73",
  5. "date": "05/27/2021",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page12 of 24\njustifying the MDC's decision to monitor Maxwell more frequently at night than other inmates. (Id.). With respect to eye coverings, Judge Nathan noted that the prohibition on eye masks \"is a generally applicable policy,\" but Maxwell is nevertheless permitted to \"use other non-contraband items to cover her eyes\" at night. (Id. at 2). Judge Nathan concluded that \"nothing in the record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell's ability to prepare for her trial and communicate with her lawyers.\" (Id.). Consistent with the attention she has paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement throughout the pendency of this case, Judge Nathan instructed the Government and the MDC \"to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols\" that are \"necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees.\" (Id.).\n\nARGUMENT\nMaxwell's Motion Should Be Denied\n22. This Court has already affirmed Judge Nathan's orders denying bail or temporary pretrial release to Maxwell and accordingly denied her motions seeking such relief on appeal. The instant motion, which Maxwell styles as a\n12\nDOJ-OGR-00001452",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page12 of 24",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "justifying the MDC's decision to monitor Maxwell more frequently at night than other inmates. (Id.). With respect to eye coverings, Judge Nathan noted that the prohibition on eye masks \"is a generally applicable policy,\" but Maxwell is nevertheless permitted to \"use other non-contraband items to cover her eyes\" at night. (Id. at 2). Judge Nathan concluded that \"nothing in the record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell's ability to prepare for her trial and communicate with her lawyers.\" (Id.). Consistent with the attention she has paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement throughout the pendency of this case, Judge Nathan instructed the Government and the MDC \"to continue to ensure that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols\" that are \"necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees.\" (Id.).",
  20. "position": "top"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "ARGUMENT",
  25. "position": "middle"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "Maxwell's Motion Should Be Denied",
  30. "position": "middle"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "22. This Court has already affirmed Judge Nathan's orders denying bail or temporary pretrial release to Maxwell and accordingly denied her motions seeking such relief on appeal. The instant motion, which Maxwell styles as a",
  35. "position": "middle"
  36. },
  37. {
  38. "type": "printed",
  39. "content": "12",
  40. "position": "footer"
  41. },
  42. {
  43. "type": "printed",
  44. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001452",
  45. "position": "footer"
  46. }
  47. ],
  48. "entities": {
  49. "people": [
  50. "Maxwell",
  51. "Judge Nathan"
  52. ],
  53. "organizations": [
  54. "MDC",
  55. "Government",
  56. "Court"
  57. ],
  58. "locations": [],
  59. "dates": [
  60. "05/27/2021"
  61. ],
  62. "reference_numbers": [
  63. "21-770",
  64. "73",
  65. "3109708",
  66. "DOJ-OGR-00001452"
  67. ]
  68. },
  69. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Maxwell, with discussions about her conditions of confinement and a motion being considered. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes."
  70. }