mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001887.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "10",
    "document_number": "93",
    "date": "12/10/20",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 10 of 91\n\n1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n2 The difference is a small ministerial correction, a reference to a civil docket number contained in the perjury counts, which are Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. Aside from the alteration of those docket numbers, the reference to them, there are no other changes to the indictment.\n3 \n4 THE COURT: All right. Again, I will conduct the arraignment on the S1 indictment.\n5 Ms. Maxwell, have you seen a copy of the S1 indictment in this matter?\n6 \n7 THE DEFENDANT: I saw the original indictment, your Honor. The original --\n8 \n9 THE COURT: Okay.\n10 All right. Mr. Cohen, did you have an opportunity to discuss with Ms. Maxwell the ministerial change that was completed by way of the superseding indictment?\n11 \n12 MR. COHEN: Yes, yes, Judge. We have, your Honor.\n13 \n14 THE COURT: Any objection to proceeding on the arraignment of the S1 indictment, Mr. Cohen?\n15 \n16 MR. COHEN: No, your Honor.\n17 \n18 THE COURT: All right.\n19 Ms. Maxwell, have you had an opportunity to discuss the indictment in this case with your attorney?\n20 \n21 THE DEFENDANT: I have, your Honor.\n22 \n23 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n24 (212) 805-0300\n25 DOJ-OGR-00001887",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 10 of 91",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.\n2 The difference is a small ministerial correction, a reference to a civil docket number contained in the perjury counts, which are Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. Aside from the alteration of those docket numbers, the reference to them, there are no other changes to the indictment.\n3 \n4 THE COURT: All right. Again, I will conduct the arraignment on the S1 indictment.\n5 Ms. Maxwell, have you seen a copy of the S1 indictment in this matter?\n6 \n7 THE DEFENDANT: I saw the original indictment, your Honor. The original --\n8 \n9 THE COURT: Okay.\n10 All right. Mr. Cohen, did you have an opportunity to discuss with Ms. Maxwell the ministerial change that was completed by way of the superseding indictment?\n11 \n12 MR. COHEN: Yes, yes, Judge. We have, your Honor.\n13 \n14 THE COURT: Any objection to proceeding on the arraignment of the S1 indictment, Mr. Cohen?\n15 \n16 MR. COHEN: No, your Honor.\n17 \n18 THE COURT: All right.\n19 Ms. Maxwell, have you had an opportunity to discuss the indictment in this case with your attorney?\n20 \n21 THE DEFENDANT: I have, your Honor.",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001887",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Moe",
      "Ms. Maxwell",
      "Mr. Cohen"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "12/10/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "93",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001887"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}