| 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "51",
- "document_number": "93",
- "date": "12/10/20",
- "document_type": "court document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 51 of 91\n\nk7e2MaxC kjc\n\n1 arrest. That defendant was released on bail conditions, strict bail conditions.\n\n2\n3 And I mention Esposito, which is the 2019 case from\n4 Judge Marrero, that is a case in which the allegation was that\n5 the defendant was a senior ranking member of organized crime\n6 and had access to financial means as well.\n\n7\n8 But all of those cases, as well as Madoff and Dreier,\n9 which I'm sure the court is familiar, with involved allegations\n10 of defendants with hundreds of millions of dollars, in all of\n11 those cases, the courts held that bail should be set subject to\n12 strict conditions. And by the way, Judge, in all of those\n13 cases, the defendants appeared for court. They all made\n14 appearances and appeared for trial.\n\n15 There are also cases from the context involving\n16 pornography or sex crime allegations, such as the Deutsch case\n17 coming from the Eastern District several years ago, the Conway\n18 case in the Northern District of California. Again,\n19 understanding those are the allegations, the decision was made\n20 that release could be awarded on conditions.\n\n21 You even had one recently in the Second Circuit that\n22 I'm sure everyone is familiar with United States v. Mattis,\n23 different setting, because that was a dangerousness case and\n24 the government is not proceeding on dangerousness grounds, but\n25 that is the case where the allegation is that two attorneys\n25 threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car; challenge to bail\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nDOJ-OGR-00001928",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 51 of 91",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "k7e2MaxC kjc\n\n1 arrest. That defendant was released on bail conditions, strict bail conditions.\n\n2\n3 And I mention Esposito, which is the 2019 case from\n4 Judge Marrero, that is a case in which the allegation was that\n5 the defendant was a senior ranking member of organized crime\n6 and had access to financial means as well.\n\n7\n8 But all of those cases, as well as Madoff and Dreier,\n9 which I'm sure the court is familiar, with involved allegations\n10 of defendants with hundreds of millions of dollars, in all of\n11 those cases, the courts held that bail should be set subject to\n12 strict conditions. And by the way, Judge, in all of those\n13 cases, the defendants appeared for court. They all made\n14 appearances and appeared for trial.\n\n15 There are also cases from the context involving\n16 pornography or sex crime allegations, such as the Deutsch case\n17 coming from the Eastern District several years ago, the Conway\n18 case in the Northern District of California. Again,\n19 understanding those are the allegations, the decision was made\n20 that release could be awarded on conditions.\n\n21 You even had one recently in the Second Circuit that\n22 I'm sure everyone is familiar with United States v. Mattis,\n23 different setting, because that was a dangerousness case and\n24 the government is not proceeding on dangerousness grounds, but\n25 that is the case where the allegation is that two attorneys\n25 threw a Molotov cocktail into a police car; challenge to bail",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001928",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Esposito",
- "Marrero",
- "Madoff",
- "Dreier",
- "Deutsch",
- "Conway",
- "Mattis"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [
- "Eastern District",
- "Northern District of California",
- "Second Circuit"
- ],
- "dates": [
- "2019",
- "12/10/20"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "Document 93",
- "DOJ-OGR-00001928"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or legal document. The text is printed and there are no visible stamps or handwritten notes. The document is from a court case with the reference number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN."
- }
|