mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00001974.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "97",
    "date": "12/14/20",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 45\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................... 1\nARGUMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 7\nI. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) ............................... 7\nII. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions ............................................ 10\nA. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond ............ 10\n1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving the Country ........ 11\n2. A Number of Ms. Maxwell's Family and Friends, and the Security Company Protecting Her, Are Prepared to Sign Significant Bonds ............................................................................................................................... 13\nB. Ms. Maxwell Has Provided a Thorough Review of Her Finances for the Past Five Years ............................... 15\nC. Ms. Maxwell Was Not Hiding from the Government Before Her Arrest ....................................................... 18\n1. Ms. Maxwell Was Trying to Protect Herself from a Media Frenzy and from Physical Threats ....................... 18\n2. Ms. Maxwell's Counsel Was in Regular Contact with the Government Prior to Her Arrest ............................ 22\n3. Ms. Maxwell Did Not Try to Avoid Arrest, Nor Was She “Good At” Hiding ................................................... 23\nD. Ms. Maxwell Has Waived Her Extradition Rights and Could Not Seek Refuge in the United Kingdom or France .................................................................................................................................................... 25\nE. The Discovery Contains No Meaningful Documentary Corroboration of the Government's Allegations Against Ms. Maxwell .......................................................................................................................................... 30\nF. The Proposed Bail Package Is Expansive and Far Exceeds What Is Necessary to Reasonably Assure Ms. Maxwell's Presence in Court ........................................................................................................................ 34\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00001974",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 97 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 45",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Page\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................... 1\nARGUMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 7\nI. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) ............................... 7\nII. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions ............................................ 10\nA. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond ............ 10\n1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving the Country ........ 11\n2. A Number of Ms. Maxwell's Family and Friends, and the Security Company Protecting Her, Are Prepared to Sign Significant Bonds ............................................................................................................................... 13\nB. Ms. Maxwell Has Provided a Thorough Review of Her Finances for the Past Five Years ............................... 15\nC. Ms. Maxwell Was Not Hiding from the Government Before Her Arrest ....................................................... 18\n1. Ms. Maxwell Was Trying to Protect Herself from a Media Frenzy and from Physical Threats ....................... 18\n2. Ms. Maxwell's Counsel Was in Regular Contact with the Government Prior to Her Arrest ............................ 22\n3. Ms. Maxwell Did Not Try to Avoid Arrest, Nor Was She “Good At” Hiding ................................................... 23\nD. Ms. Maxwell Has Waived Her Extradition Rights and Could Not Seek Refuge in the United Kingdom or France .................................................................................................................................................... 25\nE. The Discovery Contains No Meaningful Documentary Corroboration of the Government's Allegations Against Ms. Maxwell .......................................................................................................................................... 30\nF. The Proposed Bail Package Is Expansive and Far Exceeds What Is Necessary to Reasonably Assure Ms. Maxwell's Presence in Court ........................................................................................................................ 34\ni",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00001974",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [
      "United States",
      "United Kingdom",
      "France"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "12/14/20"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 97",
      "DOJ-OGR-00001974"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of Ms. Maxwell. The table of contents outlines the arguments and sections of the document. There are no visible redactions or damage to the document."
}