mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002431.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "22",
    "document_number": "136",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 22 of 27\n\nAccording to Wiktionary, we are still in the 2000s: \"2000s (Noun) The millennium that began on January 1, 2000 and ends on December 31, 2999.\" Also as defined in: Dictionary:\n2000s may refer to:\n- 2000s (decade), the period from 2000 to 2009\n- The period from 2000 to 2099, almost synonymous with the 21st century (2001-2100)\n- The period from 2000 to 2999, almost synonymous with the 3rd millennium (2001-3000)\n(Accessed December 18, 2020). The question posed, with the ambiguous date range was inclusive, meaning the answer would cover the entire period, not a part of that period. The answer, that Ms. Maxwell was unaware of \"sexual activities\" spanning more than a millennium was accurate and truthful.\n3. Questions About [REDACTED]\n[REDACTED]\nEx. K at 113.\nThese questions and answers were completely immaterial to the defamation action, were inadmissible in the action, and could not have influenced any fact finder. They were also ambiguous. Prior to the quoted testimony there were discussions about sexual and professional massages. Here, the questioner fails to clarify what type of \"massage\" he is referring to.\n17\nDOJ-OGR-00002431",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 22 of 27",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "According to Wiktionary, we are still in the 2000s: \"2000s (Noun) The millennium that began on January 1, 2000 and ends on December 31, 2999.\" Also as defined in: Dictionary:\n2000s may refer to:\n- 2000s (decade), the period from 2000 to 2009\n- The period from 2000 to 2099, almost synonymous with the 21st century (2001-2100)\n- The period from 2000 to 2999, almost synonymous with the 3rd millennium (2001-3000)",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "(Accessed December 18, 2020). The question posed, with the ambiguous date range was inclusive, meaning the answer would cover the entire period, not a part of that period. The answer, that Ms. Maxwell was unaware of \"sexual activities\" spanning more than a millennium was accurate and truthful.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "3. Questions About [REDACTED]\n[REDACTED]\nEx. K at 113.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "These questions and answers were completely immaterial to the defamation action, were inadmissible in the action, and could not have influenced any fact finder. They were also ambiguous. Prior to the quoted testimony there were discussions about sexual and professional massages. Here, the questioner fails to clarify what type of \"massage\" he is referring to.",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "17",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002431",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Wiktionary",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "January 1, 2000",
      "December 31, 2999",
      "December 18, 2020",
      "2000",
      "2009",
      "2099",
      "2100",
      "2999",
      "3000",
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 136",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002431"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document contains redactions and appears to be a court document related to a defamation action. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps."
}