mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002485.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "19",
    "document_number": "136-9",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case: 120-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 19 of 33\n1 375. Response in opposition to the motion to strike.\n2 Not sealed.\n3 Document No. 77. I think it's docket entry 315.\n4 Motion to compel. Unseal and redact the names and identifying\n5 information of nonparties and their testimony. Page 12. The\n6 last bullet point shall remain redacted. It relates to private\n7 conduct. Argument may be unsealed. The public Vanity Fair\n8 article may be unsealed.\n9 316. Ms. Schultz's declaration. Unseal and redact\n10 the names and identifying information of the nonparties.\n11 316-1. Excerpts from a Does deposition. We are not\n12 up to that Doe yet. Remain sealed.\n13 Document No. 80. Forgive me. I don't have the docket\n14 entry but it is composite Exhibit 2. It's excerpts from a\n15 Doe's deposition. Not up to that Doe yet. Keep sealed.\n16 316-3. Excerpts from Detective Recarey's deposition.\n17 Unseal except for names and identifying information of\n18 nonparties.\n19 316-4. Excerpts of a Doe deposition. Not up to that\n20 Doe. Keep sealed.\n21 Document No. 83, which is composite Exhibit 5. These\n22 are excerpts from Doe 1's deposition. Apparently, the Second\n23 Circuit already released them without redactions.\n24 316-6. June 20, 2016 order from Judge Sweet. This\n25 was filed at docket entry 264-1 and the same redactions shall\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\nDOJ-OGR-00002485",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case: 120-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 19 of 33",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 375. Response in opposition to the motion to strike.\n2 Not sealed.\n3 Document No. 77. I think it's docket entry 315.\n4 Motion to compel. Unseal and redact the names and identifying\n5 information of nonparties and their testimony. Page 12. The\n6 last bullet point shall remain redacted. It relates to private\n7 conduct. Argument may be unsealed. The public Vanity Fair\n8 article may be unsealed.\n9 316. Ms. Schultz's declaration. Unseal and redact\n10 the names and identifying information of the nonparties.\n11 316-1. Excerpts from a Does deposition. We are not\n12 up to that Doe yet. Remain sealed.\n13 Document No. 80. Forgive me. I don't have the docket\n14 entry but it is composite Exhibit 2. It's excerpts from a\n15 Doe's deposition. Not up to that Doe yet. Keep sealed.\n16 316-3. Excerpts from Detective Recarey's deposition.\n17 Unseal except for names and identifying information of\n18 nonparties.\n19 316-4. Excerpts of a Doe deposition. Not up to that\n20 Doe. Keep sealed.\n21 Document No. 83, which is composite Exhibit 5. These\n22 are excerpts from Doe 1's deposition. Apparently, the Second\n23 Circuit already released them without redactions.\n24 316-6. June 20, 2016 order from Judge Sweet. This\n25 was filed at docket entry 264-1 and the same redactions shall",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002485",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ms. Schultz",
      "Detective Recarey",
      "Judge Sweet"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "June 20, 2016",
      "02/04/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "120-cr-00330-AJN",
      "136-9",
      "77",
      "315",
      "316",
      "80",
      "83",
      "264-1",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002485"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript or filing discussing the sealing and redaction of various documents related to a court case. The text is mostly printed, with no visible handwriting or stamps. The document includes references to specific docket entries and court documents."
}