| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2",
- "document_number": "140",
- "date": "02/04/21",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 22\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................................................... ii\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1\nARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 2\nI. The government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression. ....................... 2\nA. The subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment because it was unconstitutionally overbroad. ............................................................................................................................... 4\nB. The government's subpoena to [REDACTED] was an unconstitutional warrantless Fourth Amendment search. ............................................................................................................................... 6\n1. The third-party doctrine does not compel a different result. ................................................ 8\nC. The government's subpoena to [REDACTED] was an unconstitutional Fourth Amendment seizure. ............................................................................................................................... 11\nII. The government's violation of Martindell requires suppression. .............................................. 11\nIII. The government's violation of the Fifth Amendment requires suppression. ....................... 15\nConclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 17\nCertificate of Service ........................................................................................................................... 18\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00002550",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 22",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... i\nTABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................................................................................... ii\nFACTUAL BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1\nARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 2\nI. The government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression. ....................... 2\nA. The subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment because it was unconstitutionally overbroad. ............................................................................................................................... 4\nB. The government's subpoena to [REDACTED] was an unconstitutional warrantless Fourth Amendment search. ............................................................................................................................... 6\n1. The third-party doctrine does not compel a different result. ................................................ 8\nC. The government's subpoena to [REDACTED] was an unconstitutional Fourth Amendment seizure. ............................................................................................................................... 11\nII. The government's violation of Martindell requires suppression. .............................................. 11\nIII. The government's violation of the Fifth Amendment requires suppression. ....................... 15\nConclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 17\nCertificate of Service ........................................................................................................................... 18",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "i\nDOJ-OGR-00002550",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [],
- "organizations": [
- "DOJ"
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "02/04/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "140",
- "DOJ-OGR-00002550"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with a table of contents. There are redactions in the text, likely to protect sensitive information. The document is well-formatted and clear."
- }
|