mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES001/DOJ-OGR-00002650.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "2",
    "document_number": "144",
    "date": "02/04/21",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 144 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 25\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 1\nSUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 2\nARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 3\nI. The 2003 Amendment Does Not Apply Retroactively............................................................................. 3\nA. Step One: Congress did not expressly prescribe retroactivity and rejected a proposal to do so. ............ 6\nB. Step Two: Application of the 2003 Amendment to Ms. Maxwell's alleged offenses would have impermissible effects. ......................................................................................................................................... 9\nII. Section 3283 Does Not Apply at All. ..................................................................................................... 12\nA. Section 3283 applies only to offenses that necessarily entail the sexual or physical abuse, or kidnapping, of a child............................................................................................................................... 12\nB. The offenses charged in Counts One through Four do not necessarily entail the sexual or physical abuse or kidnapping of a child. ........................................................................................................................... 15\nCONCLUSION................................................................................................................................................ 18\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00002650",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 144 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 25",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 1\nSUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 2\nARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................................... 3\nI. The 2003 Amendment Does Not Apply Retroactively............................................................................. 3\nA. Step One: Congress did not expressly prescribe retroactivity and rejected a proposal to do so. ............ 6\nB. Step Two: Application of the 2003 Amendment to Ms. Maxwell's alleged offenses would have impermissible effects. ......................................................................................................................................... 9\nII. Section 3283 Does Not Apply at All. ..................................................................................................... 12\nA. Section 3283 applies only to offenses that necessarily entail the sexual or physical abuse, or kidnapping, of a child............................................................................................................................... 12\nB. The offenses charged in Counts One through Four do not necessarily entail the sexual or physical abuse or kidnapping of a child. ........................................................................................................................... 15\nCONCLUSION................................................................................................................................................ 18",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "i",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002650",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Maxwell"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Congress",
      "DOJ"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "02/04/21",
      "2003"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
      "Document 144",
      "DOJ-OGR-00002650"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a case against Ms. Maxwell. The table of contents outlines the structure of the document, including sections on the preliminary statement, summary of allegations, argument, and conclusion. The document is filed with the court on February 4, 2021, and is part of a larger case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN)."
}