| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "2",
- "document_number": "146",
- "date": "02/04/21",
- "document_type": "Court Document",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 16\n\nTABLE OF CONTENTS\n\nPage\nPRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 1\nSUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3\nARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 5\nI. All References to Accuser-3 Should Be Stricken as Surplusage ............................................................... 5\nA. The Indictment Is Insufficient to Allege a Conspiracy as to Accuser-3 ................................................ 6\nB. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Irrelevant to the Alleged Conspiracies ............................... 7\nC. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell ..................................... 9\nII. In the Alternative, the Government Should Be Required to Demonstrate the Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Accuser-3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) ........ 10\nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 11\ni\nDOJ-OGR-00002677",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 146 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 16",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
- "position": "top"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 1\nSUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3\nARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................... 5\nI. All References to Accuser-3 Should Be Stricken as Surplusage ............................................................... 5\nA. The Indictment Is Insufficient to Allege a Conspiracy as to Accuser-3 ................................................ 6\nB. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Irrelevant to the Alleged Conspiracies ............................... 7\nC. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell ..................................... 9\nII. In the Alternative, the Government Should Be Required to Demonstrate the Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Accuser-3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) ........ 10\nCONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 11",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "i",
- "position": "middle"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "DOJ-OGR-00002677",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "Ms. Maxwell",
- "Accuser-3"
- ],
- "organizations": [],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "02/04/21"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-AJN",
- "146",
- "DOJ-OGR-00002677"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to a criminal case. The table of contents suggests that the document argues for the exclusion of certain allegations and evidence related to 'Accuser-3'. The document is well-formatted and free of significant damage or redactions."
- }
|