mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003415.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "239",
    "document_number": "204-3",
    "date": "04/16/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 239 of 348\nshe would inform victims of the terms of the resolution of the federal case, including Epstein's agreement to plead guilty to state charges and serve 18 months in county jail, and the victims' ability to seek monetary damages against Epstein. The letter also would invite victims to appear at the state court hearing and make a statement under oath or provide a written statement to be filed by the State Attorney's Office. Sloman and Villafaña exchanged edits on the draft victim notification letter, and Villafaña also informed Sloman that \"[t]here are a few girls who didn't receive the original letters, so I will need to modify the introductory portion of the letter for those.\"312\nSloman informed Lefkowitz of the government's need to meet its \"statutory obligation (Justice for All Act of 2004) to notify the victims of the anticipated upcoming events and their rights associated with the agreement\" and his intent to \"notify the victims by letter after COB Thursday, November 29.\" Lefkowitz objected to the proposal to notify the victims, asserting that it was \"incendiary and inappropriate\" and not warranted under the Justice for All Act of 2004. He argued that the defense \"should have a right to review and make objections to that submission prior to it being sent to any alleged victims.\" He also insisted that if any notification letters were sent to \"victims, who still have not been identified to us, it should happen only after Mr. Epstein has entered his plea\" and that the letter should come from the attorney representative rather than the government. On November 28, 2007, at Sloman's instruction, Villafaña provided Lefkowitz with the draft victim notification letter, which would advise victims that the state court plea was to occur on December 14, 2007.313\nIn a November 29, 2007 letter to Acosta, Lefkowitz strongly objected to the proposed draft notification letter, arguing that the government was not obligated to send any letter to victims until after Epstein's plea and sentencing. Lefkowitz also contended that the victims had no right to appear at Epstein's state plea hearing and sentencing or to provide a written statement for such a proceeding. In a November 30, 2007 reply letter to Lefkowitz, Acosta did not address the substance of Lefkowitz's arguments, but accused the defense team of \"in essence presenting collateral challenges\" delaying effectuation of the NPA, and asserted that if Epstein was dissatisfied with the NPA, \"we stand ready to unwind the Agreement\" and proceed to trial. Shortly thereafter, Acosta informed defense counsel Starr by letter that he had directed prosecutors \"not to issue victim notification letters until this Friday [December 7] at 5 p.m., to provide you with time to review these options with your client.\" In the letter, Acosta also refuted defense allegations that Villafaña had acted improperly by informing the victims of the potential for receiving monetary damages, stating that \"the victims were not told of the availability of Section 2255 relief during the investigation phase of this matter.\"\nOn December 5, 2007, Starr and Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta, with copies to Sloman and Assistant Attorney General Fisher, \"reaffirm[ing]\" the NPA, but taking \"serious issue\" with\n312 On November 28, 2007, two months after the NPA was signed, the lead case agent informed Villafaña that only 15 of the then-known victims had received victim notification letters from either the FBI or the USAO. On December 6, 2007, the lead case agent reported to Villafaña that she was \"still holding many of the original V/W letters addressed to victims from the USAO.\"\n313 Villafaña understood the state prosecutors had set the December 14, 2007 date, and emailed them for confirmation, stating, \"[I]f the matter is set for the 14th, please let me know so I can include that in my victim notifications.\"\n213\nDOJ-OGR-00003415",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 239 of 348",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "she would inform victims of the terms of the resolution of the federal case, including Epstein's agreement to plead guilty to state charges and serve 18 months in county jail, and the victims' ability to seek monetary damages against Epstein. The letter also would invite victims to appear at the state court hearing and make a statement under oath or provide a written statement to be filed by the State Attorney's Office. Sloman and Villafaña exchanged edits on the draft victim notification letter, and Villafaña also informed Sloman that \"[t]here are a few girls who didn't receive the original letters, so I will need to modify the introductory portion of the letter for those.\"312",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Sloman informed Lefkowitz of the government's need to meet its \"statutory obligation (Justice for All Act of 2004) to notify the victims of the anticipated upcoming events and their rights associated with the agreement\" and his intent to \"notify the victims by letter after COB Thursday, November 29.\" Lefkowitz objected to the proposal to notify the victims, asserting that it was \"incendiary and inappropriate\" and not warranted under the Justice for All Act of 2004. He argued that the defense \"should have a right to review and make objections to that submission prior to it being sent to any alleged victims.\" He also insisted that if any notification letters were sent to \"victims, who still have not been identified to us, it should happen only after Mr. Epstein has entered his plea\" and that the letter should come from the attorney representative rather than the government. On November 28, 2007, at Sloman's instruction, Villafaña provided Lefkowitz with the draft victim notification letter, which would advise victims that the state court plea was to occur on December 14, 2007.313",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "In a November 29, 2007 letter to Acosta, Lefkowitz strongly objected to the proposed draft notification letter, arguing that the government was not obligated to send any letter to victims until after Epstein's plea and sentencing. Lefkowitz also contended that the victims had no right to appear at Epstein's state plea hearing and sentencing or to provide a written statement for such a proceeding. In a November 30, 2007 reply letter to Lefkowitz, Acosta did not address the substance of Lefkowitz's arguments, but accused the defense team of \"in essence presenting collateral challenges\" delaying effectuation of the NPA, and asserted that if Epstein was dissatisfied with the NPA, \"we stand ready to unwind the Agreement\" and proceed to trial. Shortly thereafter, Acosta informed defense counsel Starr by letter that he had directed prosecutors \"not to issue victim notification letters until this Friday [December 7] at 5 p.m., to provide you with time to review these options with your client.\" In the letter, Acosta also refuted defense allegations that Villafaña had acted improperly by informing the victims of the potential for receiving monetary damages, stating that \"the victims were not told of the availability of Section 2255 relief during the investigation phase of this matter.\"",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "On December 5, 2007, Starr and Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta, with copies to Sloman and Assistant Attorney General Fisher, \"reaffirm[ing]\" the NPA, but taking \"serious issue\" with",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "312 On November 28, 2007, two months after the NPA was signed, the lead case agent informed Villafaña that only 15 of the then-known victims had received victim notification letters from either the FBI or the USAO. On December 6, 2007, the lead case agent reported to Villafaña that she was \"still holding many of the original V/W letters addressed to victims from the USAO.\"",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "313 Villafaña understood the state prosecutors had set the December 14, 2007 date, and emailed them for confirmation, stating, \"[I]f the matter is set for the 14th, please let me know so I can include that in my victim notifications.\"",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "213",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003415",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Epstein",
      "Sloman",
      "Villafaña",
      "Lefkowitz",
      "Acosta",
      "Starr",
      "Fisher"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "State Attorney's Office",
      "FBI",
      "USAO"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "November 28, 2007",
      "November 29, 2007",
      "November 30, 2007",
      "December 5, 2007",
      "December 6, 2007",
      "December 7, 2007",
      "December 14, 2007",
      "04/16/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 204-3",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003415"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The text is mostly printed, with some footnotes and citations. There are no visible stamps or handwritten text."
}