mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00003988.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "246",
    "date": "April 22, 2021",
    "document_type": "Court Document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 246 Filed 04/23/21 Page 1 of 13\nHaddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C\nLaura A. Menninger\n150 East 10th Avenue\nDenver, Colorado 80203\nPH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628\nwww.hmflaw.com\nLMennifer@hmflaw.com\nApril 22, 2021\nThe Hon. Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court Judge\nSouthern District of New York\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10007\nRe: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nRequest for Adjournment of 120 or 180 Days for Trial on the Non-Perjury Counts\nDear Judge Nathan:\nPursuant to the Court's Order of April 20, 2012, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell move for a continuance of the trial of the non-perjury counts for the reasons set forth below. The S2 indictment tripled the scope of the time frame at issue and expanded both the scope and type of conduct on trial, necessitating a re-review of millions of pages of discovery (most of which is not OCR or search capable), multiplying the type of experts needed for trial, and altering the COVID-challenging worldwide investigation to a new set of hundreds of witnesses. Layered onto this complexity, Ms. Maxwell still has not been provided an opportunity to review the entire set of discovery provided last November because the government-provided laptop and hard-drives are missing critical data and software; even her counsel is unable to access significant portions of the \"old\" discovery. Nor has Ms. Maxwell been afforded any opportunity to review the \"new\" 20,000-plus pages of, essentially, Brady material produced last week by the government related to 225 non-testifying witnesses. A continuance under these circumstances is a necessity for a fair trial on charges amounting to a potential life sentence.\nDOJ-OGR-00003988",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 246 Filed 04/23/21 Page 1 of 13",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C\nLaura A. Menninger\n150 East 10th Avenue\nDenver, Colorado 80203\nPH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628\nwww.hmflaw.com\nLMennifer@hmflaw.com",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "April 22, 2021\nThe Hon. Alison J. Nathan\nUnited States District Court Judge\nSouthern District of New York\n40 Foley Square\nNew York, NY 10007",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)\nRequest for Adjournment of 120 or 180 Days for Trial on the Non-Perjury Counts",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Dear Judge Nathan:\nPursuant to the Court's Order of April 20, 2012, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell move for a continuance of the trial of the non-perjury counts for the reasons set forth below. The S2 indictment tripled the scope of the time frame at issue and expanded both the scope and type of conduct on trial, necessitating a re-review of millions of pages of discovery (most of which is not OCR or search capable), multiplying the type of experts needed for trial, and altering the COVID-challenging worldwide investigation to a new set of hundreds of witnesses. Layered onto this complexity, Ms. Maxwell still has not been provided an opportunity to review the entire set of discovery provided last November because the government-provided laptop and hard-drives are missing critical data and software; even her counsel is unable to access significant portions of the \"old\" discovery. Nor has Ms. Maxwell been afforded any opportunity to review the \"new\" 20,000-plus pages of, essentially, Brady material produced last week by the government related to 225 non-testifying witnesses. A continuance under these circumstances is a necessity for a fair trial on charges amounting to a potential life sentence.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00003988",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan",
      "Laura A. Menninger"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C",
      "United States District Court"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "Denver",
      "Colorado",
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "April 22, 2021",
      "April 20, 2012",
      "last November",
      "last week"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 246",
      "20 Cr. 330 (AJN)",
      "DOJ-OGR-00003988"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a formal court filing with a clear structure and formatting. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}