mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004078.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "1",
    "document_number": "265",
    "date": "05/03/21",
    "document_type": "Court Order",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": true
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 265 Filed 05/03/21 Page 1 of 3\n\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\nUnited States of America,\n\n-v-\n\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.\n\n20-CR-330 (AJN)\n\nORDER\n\nALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:\n\nThe Court has received an exchange of letters that pertain to an incident that took place on April 24, 2021. Dkt. Nos. 248, 253, 254, 258, 259. Legal counsel for MDC, where Ms. Maxwell is detained pretrial, alleges that her lawyers violated Bureau of Prisons rules by providing Ms. Maxwell materials at an in-person attorney-client visit. Dkt. Nos. 254, 259. Ms. Maxwell's lawyers categorically deny the allegations and threaten separate legal action against MDC staff based on the incident and the accusation. Dkt. Nos. 253, 258. The Court intimates no views as to whether some other action or process is appropriate or proper in light of either side's allegations. This Court's obligation in this case, and any other, is to ensure that the defendant is given an opportunity to meet with her lawyers, engage in confidential attorney-client communications, and prepare for trial.\n\nMindful of that obligation, the Court declines to take further action at this time. After receiving the defense's first letter motion, the Court ordered MDC legal counsel to show cause why the Court should not grant the requested relief. Dkt. No. 249. The Court then granted in part defense counsel's original request and ordered MDC legal counsel to respond to certain questions about the April 24, 2021 incident and the procedures in place to ensure the confidentiality of Ms. Maxwell's lawyer-client communications. Dkt. No. 255. Defense\n\nDOJ-OGR-00004078",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 265 Filed 05/03/21 Page 1 of 3",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "United States of America,\n\n-v-\n\nGhislaine Maxwell,\nDefendant.",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "20-CR-330 (AJN)\n\nORDER",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "The Court has received an exchange of letters that pertain to an incident that took place on April 24, 2021. Dkt. Nos. 248, 253, 254, 258, 259. Legal counsel for MDC, where Ms. Maxwell is detained pretrial, alleges that her lawyers violated Bureau of Prisons rules by providing Ms. Maxwell materials at an in-person attorney-client visit. Dkt. Nos. 254, 259. Ms. Maxwell's lawyers categorically deny the allegations and threaten separate legal action against MDC staff based on the incident and the accusation. Dkt. Nos. 253, 258. The Court intimates no views as to whether some other action or process is appropriate or proper in light of either side's allegations. This Court's obligation in this case, and any other, is to ensure that the defendant is given an opportunity to meet with her lawyers, engage in confidential attorney-client communications, and prepare for trial.",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Mindful of that obligation, the Court declines to take further action at this time. After receiving the defense's first letter motion, the Court ordered MDC legal counsel to show cause why the Court should not grant the requested relief. Dkt. No. 249. The Court then granted in part defense counsel's original request and ordered MDC legal counsel to respond to certain questions about the April 24, 2021 incident and the procedures in place to ensure the confidentiality of Ms. Maxwell's lawyer-client communications. Dkt. No. 255. Defense",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "stamp",
      "content": "USDC SDNY\nDOCUMENT\nELECTRONICALLY FILED\nDOC #:\nDATE FILED: 5/3/21",
      "position": "margin"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00004078",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Ghislaine Maxwell",
      "Alison J. Nathan"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "United States District Court",
      "Southern District of New York",
      "Bureau of Prisons",
      "MDC"
    ],
    "locations": [
      "New York"
    ],
    "dates": [
      "April 24, 2021",
      "05/03/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "Document 265",
      "20-CR-330 (AJN)",
      "Dkt. Nos. 248, 253, 254, 258, 259",
      "Dkt. No. 249",
      "Dkt. No. 255",
      "DOJ-OGR-00004078"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell and discusses an incident that took place on April 24, 2021. The document is stamped as being electronically filed on May 3, 2021."
}