mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004898.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "5",
    "document_number": "311-1",
    "date": "07/02/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 5 of 23\n\nxj3q1gra\n\nSEALED\n\nvery clearly said that, and Judge Broderick said in Chemical Bank the proper procedure is for somebody to make a motion to be relieved from the terms of the protective order. And it ain't you; it's somebody who's subject to the protective order.\n\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I think a little bit of context may help explain how the procedure developed, your Honor.\n\nOriginally we had submitted an All Writs Act application to Judge Sweet, which we believe was appropriate given the sort of catch-all function of that --\n\nTHE COURT: Yes, I understand that, but it still has to have a docket number in order to be a proceeding in this court.\n\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Totally understand, your Honor. But just with respect to our supplemental submission, Judge Sweet had reached out to us and asked us to submit an argument in connection with our application, and so I think whether that was sort of past experience or his preference, that is why we proceeded --\n\nTHE COURT: So here's why I'm being so persnickety. Forgive me. Not only do I have to like come up to speed pretty quickly, but you know -- I assume you know, but I certainly know, and everybody who follows civil litigation knows -- that Judge Sweet is about to get reversed in connection with this protective order in the Second Circuit. I mean, I don't have\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000856 DOJ-OGR-0000498",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 5 of 23",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "xj3q1gra\n\nSEALED",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "very clearly said that, and Judge Broderick said in Chemical Bank the proper procedure is for somebody to make a motion to be relieved from the terms of the protective order. And it ain't you; it's somebody who's subject to the protective order.\n\nMR. ROSSMILLER: I think a little bit of context may help explain how the procedure developed, your Honor.\n\nOriginally we had submitted an All Writs Act application to Judge Sweet, which we believe was appropriate given the sort of catch-all function of that --\n\nTHE COURT: Yes, I understand that, but it still has to have a docket number in order to be a proceeding in this court.\n\nMR. ROSSMILLER: Totally understand, your Honor. But just with respect to our supplemental submission, Judge Sweet had reached out to us and asked us to submit an argument in connection with our application, and so I think whether that was sort of past experience or his preference, that is why we proceeded --\n\nTHE COURT: So here's why I'm being so persnickety. Forgive me. Not only do I have to like come up to speed pretty quickly, but you know -- I assume you know, but I certainly know, and everybody who follows civil litigation knows -- that Judge Sweet is about to get reversed in connection with this protective order in the Second Circuit. I mean, I don't have",
      "position": "main content"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000856 DOJ-OGR-0000498",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Judge Broderick",
      "Judge Sweet",
      "Mr. Rossmiller"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Chemical Bank",
      "Southern District Reporters, P.C.",
      "Second Circuit"
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/02/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "311-1",
      "SDNY_GM_00000856",
      "DOJ-OGR-0000498"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating it is sealed. The content discusses legal procedures and references specific judges and court cases. The footer contains information about the transcription service and unique identifiers."
}