mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00004899.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "6",
    "document_number": "311-1",
    "date": "07/02/21",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 6 of 23\n\nXj3q1gra\n\nSEALED\n\n1 that on any authority other than my reading of the tea leaves\n2 after the extensive press reporting and the fact that the\n3 Second Circuit has already issued an order giving the parties\n4 until last week to say why the summary judgment papers and all\n5 the supporting papers should not be unsealed by the Second\n6 Circuit and indicating that there would be a further order with\n7 respect to all the rest of the, I don't know, 150 or so sealed\n8 documents in connection with the underlying litigation, but you\n9 can hear it in the questioning, you can read it in the press\n10 reports, you can intuit it from the order. I don't know if\n11 you've seen the Second Circuit's order that issued last week,\n12 but --\n13 MR. ROSSMILLER: I have, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. You can intuit that something kind\n15 of unfavorable to Judge Sweet is happening, it's in the process\n16 of happening, it seems to me it's about to be happening, in\n17 connection with this protective order and its enforceability.\n18 Doesn't seem that way to you, Mr. Rossmiller?\n19 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, I've read the same\n20 articles and --\n21 THE COURT: I mean, really, Mr. Rossmiller?\n22 MR. ROSSMILLER: So I would say, your Honor, that I\n23 would expect that any order to disclose materials that were\n24 filed in connection with, for example, the summary judgment\n25 papers, if in fact they are released or if in fact the\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000857\n\nDOJ-OGR-00004899",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 6 of 23",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Xj3q1gra\n\nSEALED",
      "position": "top"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 that on any authority other than my reading of the tea leaves\n2 after the extensive press reporting and the fact that the\n3 Second Circuit has already issued an order giving the parties\n4 until last week to say why the summary judgment papers and all\n5 the supporting papers should not be unsealed by the Second\n6 Circuit and indicating that there would be a further order with\n7 respect to all the rest of the, I don't know, 150 or so sealed\n8 documents in connection with the underlying litigation, but you\n9 can hear it in the questioning, you can read it in the press\n10 reports, you can intuit it from the order. I don't know if\n11 you've seen the Second Circuit's order that issued last week,\n12 but --\n13 MR. ROSSMILLER: I have, your Honor.\n14 THE COURT: Okay. You can intuit that something kind\n15 of unfavorable to Judge Sweet is happening, it's in the process\n16 of happening, it seems to me it's about to be happening, in\n17 connection with this protective order and its enforceability.\n18 Doesn't seem that way to you, Mr. Rossmiller?\n19 MR. ROSSMILLER: Your Honor, I've read the same\n20 articles and --\n21 THE COURT: I mean, really, Mr. Rossmiller?\n22 MR. ROSSMILLER: So I would say, your Honor, that I\n23 would expect that any order to disclose materials that were\n24 filed in connection with, for example, the summary judgment\n25 papers, if in fact they are released or if in fact the",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300 SDNY_GM_00000857",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00004899",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "Judge Sweet",
      "Mr. Rossmiller"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "Second Circuit",
      "Southern District Reporters, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "07/02/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "311-1",
      "SDNY_GM_00000857",
      "DOJ-OGR-00004899"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a header indicating it is sealed. The content discusses a court case and the potential unsealing of documents. The footer contains information about the court reporter and a reference number."
}