DOJ-OGR-00005195.json 3.7 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "17 of 22",
  4. "document_number": "338",
  5. "date": "10/12/21",
  6. "document_type": "court document",
  7. "has_handwriting": true,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 338 Filed 10/12/21 Page 17 of 22 12 V. Jeffirs, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) (No mention of §3509(a)(8) at all); United States V. Johns, 15 F.3d 740 (8th Cir. 1993) (same). See United States v. Coutentos (Supra) (applying §3509(a)(8) without explanation as to why); see Carpenter (Supra) (justifying the use of §3509(a)(8) because it was originally mislocated, and it was recodified as a part of a \"general consolidation\", which is false.) The United States has also repeatedly tried to alter video production dates to avoid §3283 altogether in §2251(a) exploitation cases. See defense Reply brief in Courtenotes available on PACER: Case 10-26251, Dec 14, 2010. p.2. 18 usc §3299 In 2002 the Justice Department recommended 18 USC §3299 type language, which would have expressly included Chapters 109A, 110, 117, §1591, and kidnappings at Chapter 55. The proposal did not pass. Instead a DNA exception at {3282(b) covering Chapter 109A was enacted to cover death, and §3283 went to life. This was a comprehensive 109A solution. 2. Letter to Biden Nov 25, 2002 From D.J. Bryant Assistant A.G. DoJ. DOJ-OGR-00005195",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 338 Filed 10/12/21 Page 17 of 22 12",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "handwritten",
  19. "content": "V. Jeffirs, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) (No mention of §3509(a)(8) at all); United States V. Johns, 15 F.3d 740 (8th Cir. 1993) (same). See United States v. Coutentos (Supra) (applying §3509(a)(8) without explanation as to why); see Carpenter (Supra) (justifying the use of §3509(a)(8) because it was originally mislocated, and it was recodified as a part of a \"general consolidation\", which is false.) The United States has also repeatedly tried to alter video production dates to avoid §3283 altogether in §2251(a) exploitation cases. See defense Reply brief in Courtenotes available on PACER: Case 10-26251, Dec 14, 2010. p.2.",
  20. "position": "main body"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "handwritten",
  24. "content": "18 usc §3299 In 2002 the Justice Department recommended 18 USC §3299 type language, which would have expressly included Chapters 109A, 110, 117, §1591, and kidnappings at Chapter 55. The proposal did not pass. Instead a DNA exception at {3282(b) covering Chapter 109A was enacted to cover death, and §3283 went to life. This was a comprehensive 109A solution.",
  25. "position": "main body"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "handwritten",
  29. "content": "2. Letter to Biden Nov 25, 2002 From D.J. Bryant Assistant A.G. DoJ.",
  30. "position": "main body"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005195",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "Jeffirs",
  41. "Johns",
  42. "Biden",
  43. "D.J. Bryant"
  44. ],
  45. "organizations": [
  46. "Justice Department",
  47. "DoJ"
  48. ],
  49. "locations": [],
  50. "dates": [
  51. "2005",
  52. "1993",
  53. "2002",
  54. "Nov 25, 2002",
  55. "Dec 14, 2010",
  56. "10/12/21"
  57. ],
  58. "reference_numbers": [
  59. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  60. "338",
  61. "405 F.3d 682",
  62. "15 F.3d 740",
  63. "18 USC §3299",
  64. "§3509(a)(8)",
  65. "§3283",
  66. "§2251(a)",
  67. "10-26251",
  68. "DOJ-OGR-00005195"
  69. ]
  70. },
  71. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing with handwritten notes. The handwriting is generally legible, but some words are difficult to read due to the quality of the scan."
  72. }