mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES002/DOJ-OGR-00005459.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "4",
    "document_number": "382",
    "date": "10/29/21",
    "document_type": "court document",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 382 Filed 10/29/21 Page 4 of 69 XI. MS. MAXWELL WAS THE PREVAILING PARTY IN CIVIL LITIGATION BASED ON THE SAME FACTS AS THIS CRIMINAL TRIAL, WHICH IS RELEVANT TO MS. MAXWELL'S DEFENSE. 57 CONCLUSION. 59 iii DOJ-OGR-00005459",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 382 Filed 10/29/21 Page 4 of 69",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "XI. MS. MAXWELL WAS THE PREVAILING PARTY IN CIVIL LITIGATION BASED ON THE SAME FACTS AS THIS CRIMINAL TRIAL, WHICH IS RELEVANT TO MS. MAXWELL'S DEFENSE. 57 CONCLUSION. 59",
      "position": "middle"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "iii",
      "position": "bottom"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00005459",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MAXWELL"
    ],
    "organizations": [],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "10/29/21"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "382",
      "DOJ-OGR-00005459"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court filing related to the case of MS. MAXWELL. The page is clean and free of handwritten notes or stamps."
}