DOJ-OGR-00011510.json 3.2 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "5",
  4. "document_number": "734-8",
  5. "date": "07/15/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 734-8 Filed 07/15/22 Page 5 of 13\nProbate ST-19-PB-0080\n111\n1 Q. Is it a confidential program as well?\n2\n3 A. It's confidential to the extent that we, as the program administrators and my\n4 staff and contractors, would be protecting the privacy of the victims. We wouldn't be sharing\n5 any information with the estate or publicly. But the confidential requirement is\n6 unilateral. It's only imposed on us and there's no requirement whatsoever that\n7 claimants limit their-- what information they want to share with whomever they wish -- you\n8 know, investigators, the public. This is an alternative to civil litigation and so we have\n9 no intention to interfere with any sort of criminal proceeding.\n10 Q. Are you familiar with the civil lawsuit that the Attorney General of the\n11 United States Virgin Islands filed in the other court?\n12\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And have you read the Complaint?\n15\n16 A. I have.\n17 Q. And direct your attention--you probably don't remember this, but I'll tell\n18 DOJ-OGR-00011510",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 734-8 Filed 07/15/22 Page 5 of 13",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "Probate ST-19-PB-0080",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "111",
  25. "position": "header"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "1 Q. Is it a confidential program as well?\n2\n3 A. It's confidential to the extent that we, as the program administrators and my\n4 staff and contractors, would be protecting the privacy of the victims. We wouldn't be sharing\n5 any information with the estate or publicly. But the confidential requirement is\n6 unilateral. It's only imposed on us and there's no requirement whatsoever that\n7 claimants limit their-- what information they want to share with whomever they wish -- you\n8 know, investigators, the public. This is an alternative to civil litigation and so we have\n9 no intention to interfere with any sort of criminal proceeding.\n10 Q. Are you familiar with the civil lawsuit that the Attorney General of the\n11 United States Virgin Islands filed in the other court?\n12\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And have you read the Complaint?\n15\n16 A. I have.\n17 Q. And direct your attention--you probably don't remember this, but I'll tell",
  30. "position": "main"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00011510",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [],
  40. "organizations": [
  41. "Attorney General"
  42. ],
  43. "locations": [
  44. "United States Virgin Islands"
  45. ],
  46. "dates": [
  47. "07/15/22"
  48. ],
  49. "reference_numbers": [
  50. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  51. "734-8",
  52. "ST-19-PB-0080",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00011510"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  57. }