mirror-epstein-docs/results/IMAGES005/DOJ-OGR-00012077.json

{
  "document_metadata": {
    "page_number": "57",
    "document_number": "745",
    "date": "08/10/22",
    "document_type": "court transcript",
    "has_handwriting": false,
    "has_stamps": false
  },
  "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 57 of 264 463 LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross 1 recall,\" you can say, \"Didn't you say the following to the FBI agent,\" and then -- MS. MENNINGER: So I believe that I do not have to refresh for impeachment, but I can ask her -- THE COURT: You're claiming that because she doesn't recall what she said, it's an inconsistent statement. There's not an inconsistency there. MS. MENNINGER: So, I can ask her, \"Did you say this?\" She can say, \"I don't recall.\" And then I can say, \"Isn't it true you said it on this date?\" And she can say, \"No, I didn't\" or \"I still don't recall.\" THE COURT: Every trial I've been to with these materials I've presided over -- and there's been a lot in ten years -- this precise thing happens. You testified X. Didn't you tell the agent some variation of x or Y. I don't remember way said to the agent. You show them the 302. Does that refresh your recollection, or didn't you -- and didn't you say if it doesn't refresh your recollection and then you get to do precisely what you're doing. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I get the statute book because it says right in 613. THE COURT: Sure. MS. MENNINGER: Yesterday I tried to show the witness an exhibit and I was directing her to when the exhibit was made SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012077",
  "text_blocks": [
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 57 of 264 463",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross",
      "position": "header"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "1 recall,\" you can say, \"Didn't you say the following to the FBI agent,\" and then -- MS. MENNINGER: So I believe that I do not have to refresh for impeachment, but I can ask her -- THE COURT: You're claiming that because she doesn't recall what she said, it's an inconsistent statement. There's not an inconsistency there. MS. MENNINGER: So, I can ask her, \"Did you say this?\" She can say, \"I don't recall.\" And then I can say, \"Isn't it true you said it on this date?\" And she can say, \"No, I didn't\" or \"I still don't recall.\" THE COURT: Every trial I've been to with these materials I've presided over -- and there's been a lot in ten years -- this precise thing happens. You testified X. Didn't you tell the agent some variation of x or Y. I don't remember way said to the agent. You show them the 302. Does that refresh your recollection, or didn't you -- and didn't you say if it doesn't refresh your recollection and then you get to do precisely what you're doing. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I get the statute book because it says right in 613. THE COURT: Sure. MS. MENNINGER: Yesterday I tried to show the witness an exhibit and I was directing her to when the exhibit was made",
      "position": "main"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
      "position": "footer"
    },
    {
      "type": "printed",
      "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012077",
      "position": "footer"
    }
  ],
  "entities": {
    "people": [
      "MS. MENNINGER"
    ],
    "organizations": [
      "FBI",
      "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
    ],
    "locations": [],
    "dates": [
      "08/10/22"
    ],
    "reference_numbers": [
      "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
      "745",
      "613",
      "302",
      "DOJ-OGR-00012077"
    ]
  },
  "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
}