DOJ-OGR-00012099.json 3.9 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "79",
  4. "document_number": "745",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 79 of 264 485 LC1VMAX3 Jane - cross attorney's letter to my law firm in which he's demanding that and the date of the letter. If she wants to say she doesn't know what her civil attorney is doing acting on her behalf, I guess she could say that. THE COURT: Okay. So if it doesn't refresh her recollection, we move on. And then if the answer is no, what then? MS. MENNINGER: Well, your Honor, that leads to a potential scenario with her attorney being a witness. But I think we would cross that bridge on another day. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. The question remains about her knowledge. And again, if we're refreshing this witness's recollection with a document she hasn't seen, I just want to make sure that the question is very precisely framed. Because there have been a number of times already this morning where the witness has been asked to just read the document and has given answers like, I don't know, but I guess that's what this says, which is beyond the scope of refreshing a recollection. So I just want to ensure we're not asking this witness to read into the record hearsay statements of her attorney which she doesn't have knowledge. THE COURT: If she says, I don't know, you can try to refresh her recollection. The question is, Does this refresh your recollection? If the answer is no, we move on. And then you do -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00012099",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 79 of 264 485",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "LC1VMAX3 Jane - cross",
  20. "position": "header"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "attorney's letter to my law firm in which he's demanding that and the date of the letter. If she wants to say she doesn't know what her civil attorney is doing acting on her behalf, I guess she could say that. THE COURT: Okay. So if it doesn't refresh her recollection, we move on. And then if the answer is no, what then? MS. MENNINGER: Well, your Honor, that leads to a potential scenario with her attorney being a witness. But I think we would cross that bridge on another day. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. The question remains about her knowledge. And again, if we're refreshing this witness's recollection with a document she hasn't seen, I just want to make sure that the question is very precisely framed. Because there have been a number of times already this morning where the witness has been asked to just read the document and has given answers like, I don't know, but I guess that's what this says, which is beyond the scope of refreshing a recollection. So I just want to ensure we're not asking this witness to read into the record hearsay statements of her attorney which she doesn't have knowledge. THE COURT: If she says, I don't know, you can try to refresh her recollection. The question is, Does this refresh your recollection? If the answer is no, we move on. And then you do --",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. },
  27. {
  28. "type": "printed",
  29. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  30. "position": "footer"
  31. },
  32. {
  33. "type": "printed",
  34. "content": "DOJ-OGR-00012099",
  35. "position": "footer"
  36. }
  37. ],
  38. "entities": {
  39. "people": [
  40. "MS. MENNINGER",
  41. "MS. MOE"
  42. ],
  43. "organizations": [
  44. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  45. ],
  46. "locations": [],
  47. "dates": [
  48. "08/10/22"
  49. ],
  50. "reference_numbers": [
  51. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  52. "745",
  53. "DOJ-OGR-00012099"
  54. ]
  55. },
  56. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and readable format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  57. }