DOJ-OGR-00013900.json 3.9 KB

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
  1. {
  2. "document_metadata": {
  3. "page_number": "41",
  4. "document_number": "761",
  5. "date": "08/10/22",
  6. "document_type": "court transcript",
  7. "has_handwriting": false,
  8. "has_stamps": false
  9. },
  10. "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 41 of 246 2336 LCGCmax2 Espinosa - direct\n1 Q. What were your typical working hours in the office?\n2 A. Typical working hours for me were about 9:30 to 6:30.\n3 Q. Now, I want to focus your attention on the time period when\n4 you started your job, so the mid to late '90s, '96, '97, '98.\n5 Who were the people who worked in the office in that time\n6 period?\n7 A. We had Jeff Schantz and Darren Indyke, the legal team.\n8 There was another attorney, Amanda Milroy. There was an\n9 accounting team, Harry Beller, Eric Gany, a woman by the name\n10 of Bella, I don't remember her last name. Also another woman\n11 named Gee, I don't remember her last name. We had a\n12 receptionist, Michelle. Jeffrey Epstein had his executive\n13 assistant, at the time was a woman named Maureen when I first\n14 started. We had -- did I say the receptionist?\n15 Q. You mentioned, I think, Michelle was a receptionist. Do\n16 you remember Michelle's last name?\n17 A. Healy.\n18 Q. Were there any other receptionists you recall?\n19 A. Yes, there was a Helen Kim that came after Michelle left.\n20 Q. And you mentioned, I think, Mr. Epstein's executive\n21 assistants; is that right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Is that separate or the same as the receptionists?\n24 A. Separate.\n25 Q. And you mentioned a Maureen. Were there any other\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  11. "text_blocks": [
  12. {
  13. "type": "printed",
  14. "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 41 of 246 2336 LCGCmax2 Espinosa - direct",
  15. "position": "header"
  16. },
  17. {
  18. "type": "printed",
  19. "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
  20. "position": "footer"
  21. },
  22. {
  23. "type": "printed",
  24. "content": "1 Q. What were your typical working hours in the office?\n2 A. Typical working hours for me were about 9:30 to 6:30.\n3 Q. Now, I want to focus your attention on the time period when\n4 you started your job, so the mid to late '90s, '96, '97, '98.\n5 Who were the people who worked in the office in that time\n6 period?\n7 A. We had Jeff Schantz and Darren Indyke, the legal team.\n8 There was another attorney, Amanda Milroy. There was an\n9 accounting team, Harry Beller, Eric Gany, a woman by the name\n10 of Bella, I don't remember her last name. Also another woman\n11 named Gee, I don't remember her last name. We had a\n12 receptionist, Michelle. Jeffrey Epstein had his executive\n13 assistant, at the time was a woman named Maureen when I first\n14 started. We had -- did I say the receptionist?\n15 Q. You mentioned, I think, Michelle was a receptionist. Do\n16 you remember Michelle's last name?\n17 A. Healy.\n18 Q. Were there any other receptionists you recall?\n19 A. Yes, there was a Helen Kim that came after Michelle left.\n20 Q. And you mentioned, I think, Mr. Epstein's executive\n21 assistants; is that right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Is that separate or the same as the receptionists?\n24 A. Separate.\n25 Q. And you mentioned a Maureen. Were there any other",
  25. "position": "main"
  26. }
  27. ],
  28. "entities": {
  29. "people": [
  30. "Jeff Schantz",
  31. "Darren Indyke",
  32. "Amanda Milroy",
  33. "Harry Beller",
  34. "Eric Gany",
  35. "Bella",
  36. "Gee",
  37. "Michelle Healy",
  38. "Jeffrey Epstein",
  39. "Maureen",
  40. "Helen Kim"
  41. ],
  42. "organizations": [
  43. "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
  44. ],
  45. "locations": [],
  46. "dates": [
  47. "08/10/22",
  48. "'96",
  49. "'97",
  50. "'98"
  51. ],
  52. "reference_numbers": [
  53. "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
  54. "761"
  55. ]
  56. },
  57. "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with clear and legible text. There are no visible redactions or damage."
  58. }