| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546 |
- {
- "document_metadata": {
- "page_number": "3",
- "document_number": "763",
- "date": "08/10/22",
- "document_type": "court transcript",
- "has_handwriting": false,
- "has_stamps": false
- },
- "full_text": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 197 2544 LCFCmax1 asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege, I'm not sure whether that -- THE COURT: I don't have a pleading, I have -- MS. MENNINGER: Well, a letter from a third party. That person also was under our subpoena. I don't know if your Honor views that as sufficient record on a Fifth Amendment assertion. We have not released the person from their subpoena. It wasn't styled as a motion to quash. So I'm a little bit unsure. Otherwise, we would like that witness to testify, as well. So, if your Honor deems it necessary to have a further record on it or a formal pleading from that witness, the witness is represented by counsel, Compton counsel, a former AUSA. So I don't know what their intentions are with regard to their client testifying beyond what the Court received in that letter. THE COURT: As I said yesterday, I don't have an application. And I asked if you have an application. MS. MENNINGER: I don't. THE COURT: And now the application is, Judge, tell me what you think we should do. MS. MENNINGER: No, it would be similar. We have a valid subpoena on the person and I would ask to enforce the subpoena and have the witness come testify. And if -- THE COURT: Have you communicated with counsel as to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "text_blocks": [
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 197 2544 LCFCmax1",
- "position": "header"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege, I'm not sure whether that -- THE COURT: I don't have a pleading, I have -- MS. MENNINGER: Well, a letter from a third party. That person also was under our subpoena. I don't know if your Honor views that as sufficient record on a Fifth Amendment assertion. We have not released the person from their subpoena. It wasn't styled as a motion to quash. So I'm a little bit unsure. Otherwise, we would like that witness to testify, as well. So, if your Honor deems it necessary to have a further record on it or a formal pleading from that witness, the witness is represented by counsel, Compton counsel, a former AUSA. So I don't know what their intentions are with regard to their client testifying beyond what the Court received in that letter. THE COURT: As I said yesterday, I don't have an application. And I asked if you have an application. MS. MENNINGER: I don't. THE COURT: And now the application is, Judge, tell me what you think we should do. MS. MENNINGER: No, it would be similar. We have a valid subpoena on the person and I would ask to enforce the subpoena and have the witness come testify. And if -- THE COURT: Have you communicated with counsel as to",
- "position": "main content"
- },
- {
- "type": "printed",
- "content": "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300",
- "position": "footer"
- }
- ],
- "entities": {
- "people": [
- "MS. MENNINGER"
- ],
- "organizations": [
- "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
- ],
- "locations": [],
- "dates": [
- "08/10/22",
- "yesterday"
- ],
- "reference_numbers": [
- "1:20-cr-00330-PAE",
- "763"
- ]
- },
- "additional_notes": "The document appears to be a court transcript with a clear and legible format. There are no visible redactions or damage."
- }
|